 |
Part
5
-
Case
No.:
-
Public Prosecutor v Kenneth Lee [CAM]
-
HLB Nominees (Tempatan) Sdn Bhd v SJA Bhd [CAM]
-
Fathi Ahmad v Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd [CAM]
-
File
size: 50kb
-
Matter:
"When the judgment was obtained
by Standard Chartered Bank against the appellant on
13.6.1987, Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd was not
in existence yet. Even when the bankruptcy notice was
issued on 6.8.1992, Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd
had not been incorporated. The bankruptcy notice was
served on the appellant on 28.9.1992, also before the
incorporation of Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd.
On 1.10.1992, the appellant filed an application to set
aside the bankruptcy notice."
-
Compagnie due Cambodge v Boy Kanamah [CAM]
-
File
size: 36kb
-
Matter:
"The Director [of Labour] made an order for the appellant to
pay the respondents RM114,001.42 as [termination
benefits under the Employment (Termination and Lay-Off
Benefits) Regulations 1980] because the appellant could not withdraw unilaterally
its notice to terminate the services of the respondents."
-
Erivesto Anderson v PP [CAM]
-
Ramli Shahdan v Motor Insurer's Bureau of West Malaysia [CAM]
-
File
size: 86kb
-
Matter:
"The Motor Insurers Bureau of
Malaysia was conceived in social justice and was born
into the then, Road Traffic Ordinance 1958. The basis of
this provision in the said ordinance was to recognise to
some extent the unfortunate position of victims of road
accidents, where experience has shown, by reason of
legal technicalities, that innocent victims, despite the
requirements of Compulsory Third Party Insurance, failed
to obtain any compensation."
-
Sayang Plantation Bhd v Koh [CAM]
-
APV Hill & Mills (M) Sdn Bhd v Eurotran Charter Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
File
size: 52kb
-
Matter:
"the equipment went on the feeder vessel “Seng
Leong” on its journey from Port Klang to Singapore. In
Singapore, it was kept at a godown .... Problem arose
with the authority in Singapore and the equipment was
asked to be removed from there. The third party
requested from the plaintiff for instructions for the
equipment to be brought back .... to Port Klang."
-
Syarikat Mohd Noor Yusof Sdn Bhd v Polibina Engineering Enterprise Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
File
size: 51kb
-
Matter:
"It is the stand of the
appellant that as the works in question were done by
other contractors who have been paid and the fact that
the respondent had abandoned the works and was wound up,
there is no debt due to the respondent from the
appellant. The appellant further contended that upon
receiving the respondent’s [winding-up] notice issued
pursuant to section 218 of the Companies Act 1965."
-
Pasupathy v PP [CAM]
-
Matthias Chang v The District Grand Lodge of the Eastern Archipelago [CAM]
-
File
size: 32kb
-
Matter:
"The crux of this appeal, is
basically about a complaint of alleged misconduct of the
Appellant, as a member of the Freemason Lodge .... It
was the constitutional set up of the Committee of
Inquiry and the manner in which the inquiry was
conducted that formed the subject matter of Civil Suit
...."
-
Choo v Concrete Engineering Products [CAM]
-
File
size: 78kb
-
Matter:
".... the management agreement
provides that the agreement is conditional upon the
approval of the Ministry of Trade and Industry and in
the event of the approval not being obtained within the
period of twelve months ...., the
agreement shall terminate and be null and void and of no
effect whatsoever."
-
Asdanusi Daut v Public Prosecutor [CAM]
-
File
size: 17kb
-
Matter:
"a police officer .... acted as agent provocateur
.... he was offered some drugs .... [he] met the two
appellants at a previously arranged place .... On
arrival, the second appellant asked the first appellant
to hand the bag containing the drug to [him] .... A
short while later, the appellants were arrested."
-
MBf Finance Bhd v Low Peng Enterprise [CAM]
-
File
size: 42kb
-
Matter:
"Respondents .... seeking for orders, inter alia,
that the hire purchase agreement .... is outside the
scope of the Hire Purchase Act 1967 thereby rendering it
void; that the agreement is a bill of sale ...."
-
Masjaya Trading Sdn Bhd v Kedah Cement Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
File
size: 47kb
-
Matter:
"plaintiff treated the defendant’s act as a
wrongful repudiation and brought an action for breach of
contract .... the plaintiff’s case was that it was a
term of the contracts that it had the exclusive right to
pack, stack and transport the defendant’s cement. It
was therefore not lawfully open to the defendant to
engage another transporter."
|