|
|
 |
Part 1
|
 |
Part 2
|
 |
Part 3
-
Case No.:
-
Y.H. Chow v A.P. Choo [PC]
-
File size: 44kb
-
Matter: "According
to the appellants, the money was put in trust by a dying man as
a provision for his widow and has been properly paid over to
her; according to the respondent, it was obtained fraudulently
from an unmarried man, when he was mentally incapable of
understanding what he was doing, ..."
-
Hagemeyer Trading Co (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v
Gibson Trading Co [FCM]
-
DGIR v Central Sugars Bhd [HCM]
-
File size: 37kb
-
Matter: "[Revenue] submitted that
the Taxpayer had not proved it was hedging. It then contended
that if speculation, it was not covered by the pioneer
certificate, it being a separate trade and the profits were
chargeable."
-
K.T. Lim v PP [HCSg]
-
File size: 33kb
-
Matter: "In my judgment, in these
circumstances, it cannot be said that the statement was a
voluntary statement in that it was not obtained by inducement or
threat and in my opinion the statement was wrongly admitted in
evidence. "
-
K.G. Lee v Phoenix Heights Estate (Pte) Ltd
[HCSg]
-
T.T. Wee v C.H. Ong [FCM]
-
Nadefinco Ltd v Kevin Corporation Sdn Bhd [FCM]
-
H.T. Chng v Sime Darby Holdings Ltd [HCSg]
-
Telok Sabang (Sabang) Bhd v Malaysia [HCB]
-
Official Assignee v Chartered Industries of
Singapore Ltd [HCSg]
-
Lian Huat Pte Ltd v Megah Commercial Co
[HCSg]
-
K.H. Khoo v E.J. Ketting [FCM]
-
File size: 32kb
-
Matter: "Following the dictum
of Smith J in Chua Chee Chor v Chua Kim Yong [1960] MLJ
127, 130, he held that failure to include a right of action as
an asset in the list annexed to the grant of letters of
administration did not affect a personal representative’s
statutory powers to sue in respect of all causes of action that
survive the deceased person"
-
Y.C. Howe v Chief Assessor of
Property Tax, Singapore [HCSg]
-
File size: 56kb
-
Matter: "the taxpayer should
be given the same opportunity of cross-examining the Chief
Assessor or his representative as he has of cross-examining the
valuer of the taxpayer. In my view, the procedure adopted by the
Valuation Review Board in this appeal was wrong. The principles
of natural justice should have been observed"
-
C.K. New v K.E. Hilborne [HCSg]
-
File size: 34kb
-
Matter: "the plaintiff after his
traffic accident ... went to the offices of the defendants’
firm, ..., a firm of advocates and solicitors, and engaged them
to act for him in making a claim and if necessary for taking
proceedings for damages"
-
Jebsen & Jessen (Singapore)
Pte Ltd v Yeung [HCSg]
|
 |
Part 4
-
Case No.
-
Rao v Sapuran Kaur [FCM]
-
Chan v Law Society of
Singapore [PC]
-
Port Swettenham Authority v TW
Wu & Co (M) Sdn Bhd [PC]
-
File size: 41kb
-
Matter: "Their Lordships consider
that the onus is upon the defendants ... to prove that they had
taken as much care of the plaintiffs’ goods as a Port Authority
of ordinary prudence would, under similar circumstances, have
taken of its own goods of the same bulk, quality and value as
the 64 lost cases"
-
Zaharah Hussin v Malaysia
[HCM]
-
Tropical Timber Industries Ltd
v Sheriff of the High Court of Penang [FCM]
-
File size: 18kb
-
Matter: "The intervenors also
contend that the subject- matter of the appeal, the
summons-in-chambers, was also by a wrong procedure and that the
adjournment into open court in order to treat the application as
a notice of motion did not remedy the situation nor save the
proceedings from being a nullity"
-
PP v Lim [HCM]
-
Y.E. Yee v Industrial Arbitration
Court [HCSg]
-
File size: 32kb
-
Matter: "After hearing submissions
by both counsel, the Industrial Arbitration Court, ... [ordered]
that as secretary and director of the company, the applicant was
to be personally liable for the payment of the retrenchment
benefits ..."
-
Mahan Singh v Malaysia [PC]
-
Soon v PP [HCM]
-
File size: 20kb
-
Matter: "s 2 ..., does not define
contrivance. It also does not include contrivance within the
definition of “copy” since copy is defined to mean “a
reproduction of a work in written form, in the form of a
recording or cinematograph film or in any other material form.”"
-
Syed Kechik v Malaysia [FCM]
-
The Andara [HCSg]
-
The Courages Colocotronis [HCSg]
-
Penang Municipal Council v
Boey [FCM]
-
File size: 37kb
-
Matter: "whether the appellants can
institute proceedings seeking an injunction to restrain a public
nuisance without the relation of the Attorney General because s
8(1) of the ‘Government Proceedings Ordinance, 1956, it is
argued, directs that only the Attorney General, or two or more
persons having obtained his written consent, may institute such
proceedings"
-
Loh v Malaysia [HCM]
-
Bui v Overseas Union Enterprise Ltd [HCSg]
-
File size: 72kb
-
Matter: "plaintiffs claim from the
defendants ... damages for the loss of their goods, i.e. wearing
apparel, jewellery ornaments, moneys and cheques which were
stolen ... from a suite occupied by them at the defendants’
hotel"
|
 |
Part 5
-
Case No.:
-
Len Omnibus Co Bhd v North
South Transport Sdn Bhd [FCM]
-
Nassim v The Collector of Land
Revenue [HCSg]
-
File size: 26kb
-
Matter: "At the hearing of the
appeal before us, it is now conceded that there is a substantial
quantity of sand on the subject land. Indeed, the main issue in
this appeal is as to the quantity of sand that can be extracted
from the subject property and its value as at the date of
acquisition. "
-
The Collector of Land Revenue
v Garden City Development Bhd [FCM]
-
File size: 117kb
-
Matter: "It is to be appreciated
that the Federal Court has since in Pengarah Tanah & Galian,
Wilayah Persekutuan v Sri Lempah Enterprise Sdn Bhd [1979] 1
MLJ held that in an application for alteration of the category
of land use, the State Executive Council may not require the
landowner to accept a lease of 99 years for his title in
perpetuity."
-
Woo v Yong [FCM]
-
T.P.C. v H.O.K [HCM]
-
Kong Thai Sawmill (Miri) Sdn
Bhd v Ling [PC]
-
File size: 70kb
-
Matter:
"The Company had no prospect of continuing life and what was
sought was merely independent control of an inevitable
liquidation But it does not follow, and should not be assumed,
that the Company had no other profitable activities open to it,
and it would be for the shareholders as a whole to decide
whether the Company should continue, ..."
-
International Investment Ltd v
Comptroller General of Inland Revenue [PC]
-
Phua v Tan [HCM]
-
IAC (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Koh
[HCSg]
-
Pakistan v Seng Peng Sawmills
Sdn Bhd [FCM]
-
File size: 44kb
-
Matter: "appeal is against the
decision of the High Court at Kuantan dismissing the application
of the appellant seeking that the respondents, ..., be
restrained from disallowing the appellant, ..., from removing
... railway sleepers and railway crossing timbers ... at Kuantan
to enable the appellant to ship the sleepers to Pakistan"
-
Yong Nyee Fan & Sons Sdn Bhd v
Kim Guan & Co Sdn Bhd [FCM]
-
File size: 131kb
-
Matter: "House No 26 Hugh Low
Street, ..., was bought ... and registered in the name of Yong
Nyee Fan & Sons Sdn Bhd (Yong & Co), ... The accounts of Yong &
Co showed that the money for the purchase came from the company
and the property was regarded as an asset of the company and
declared as such"
-
Malaysia National Insurance
Sdn Bhd v Abdul Aziz [FCM]
-
Chong v Yong [FCM]
-
The Asia Star [HCSg]
-
File size: 60kb
-
Matter: "To make a man a common
carrier he must carry the goods as a public employment; he must
carry for all indifferently; he must hold himself out as ready
to carry for reward so long as he has room; he must hold himself
out as ready to carry for hire, at a reasonable rate, as a
business"
-
Land Executive Committee v Sri Lempah
Enterprise Sdn Bhd [FCM]
|
 |
Part 6
|
 |
Part 7
|
 |
Part 8
|
 |
Part 9
|
[.... END OF 1978 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|