|
|
 |
Part
1
|
 |
Part
2
|
 |
Part
3
|
 |
Part
4
-
Case
No.:
-
Sykt
Rani's v Zain Building Property Development Co Ltd [HCM]
-
Wan Norsiah v Che Harun [HCM]
-
File
size: 34kb
-
Matter:
negligence - liability - damages - whether tortfeasor liable - whether
damages should be reduced by reason that victim, a
minor, (1) was discharged from Hospital by her parent and (2) who
then sought super natural treatment for her injury.
-
Charles Granier Sdn Bhd v Tieng Hee & Sons Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
RAP Nathan v Abdul Rahman [HCM]
-
Peter v Nio [HCM]
-
File
size: 99kb
-
Matter:
defamation -
-
Murtadza v Chong
[FCM]
-
United Hokkien
Cemeteries of Penang v Penang [FCM]
-
Soh v Lim [HCM]
-
Embong Ibrahim v Tengku Nik Maimunah [FCM]
-
Low v Law [FCM]
-
File
size: 36kb
-
Matter:
partnership - management - business partner appointed
respondent as estate manager - upon death of said partner, a
portion of his share in the partnership went under his will to
his grandson, the appellant - respondent invited appellant to
assist in management of estate on condition that he would take
orders from respondent - appellant did not do so - court
granted injunction to restrain appellant - whether respondent
has a right to ask appellant to leave - whether balance of
convenience lies in favour of appellant leaving.
-
Mohamed Mustafa v Kandasami [FCM]
-
Lim v PP [FCM]
-
File
size: 60kb
-
Matter:
government - official secrets - Royal Malaysian Navy
bought fast strike crafts from a Swedish firm (one of four
shortlisted tenderers) - appellant has details on the other
tenderers, their tender particulars & equipment -
appellant argued (1) informations came from non-government
source & hence fell outside the scope of the Official
Secrets Act 1972; & (2) as member of parliament, appellant
has duty to disclose information to public - whether appellant
was properly convicted.
-
Ponnukon v Jebaratnam [FCM]
-
Malaysia v Loh [FCM]
-
File
size: 44kb
-
Matter:
constitution - personal liberty (Art.5(1) of Federal
Constitution) - applicant, Australian permanent resident, left
Australia with Authority to Return to Australia endorsed on
his Malaysian passport - subsequently, he was convicted in
Malaysia - he needed to return to Australia but his passport
had expired - respondent deferred processing his application
for new passport - whether "personal liberty" means
freedom of movement - if so, whether respondent's conduct
amounts to preventing applicant from travelling abroad in
contravention of applicant's Consitutional rights
-
Tan v Kho [FCM]
|
 |
Part 5
|
 |
Part 6
-
Case
No.:
-
Damodaran v K.H. Choe
[PC]
-
File size: 36kb
-
Matter: "This, on the face of
it, was a very simple case, well suited to be disposed of under
the summary procedure which is available in Malaysia, as it is
in England, for enforcing solicitors’ undertakings."
-
PP v C.S. Tan [HCM]
-
Zainal Hashim v Malaysia
[PC]
-
IGP v K.H. Lee [FCM]
-
File size: 33kb
-
Matter: "As there was no
indication that the [Public Order and Prevention of Crime)
Ordinance, 1969] had been laid before both Houses, at the
hearing Mr K Pasupathy took the point quite fairly that the
Ordinance did not have the force of law as it had not been so
laid"
-
Superintendent of Pulau
Jerejak v C.H. Wong [FCM]
-
File size: 61kb
-
Matter: "The learned judge set
him free on the ground that s 4(1) of the [Emergency (Public
Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance, 1969] does not apply
to a juvenile and that a juvenile may be detained without trial
only in accordance with the Juvenile Courts Act, 1947 "
-
Kulim Rubber Plantations
Ltd v DGIR [HCM]
-
PP v C.P. Teh [HCM]
-
File size: 35kb
-
Matter: "although I would
agree that the evidence of any witness should of course be
scrutinised with care, I would not, with respect, subscribe to
any proposition that the evidence of a police witness must
invariably be corroborated in the circumstances described in the
above-mentioned passage"
-
Husdi v PP [HCM]
-
Meenal v Director of
Immigration [HCM]
-
PP v B.F. Ang [HCM]
-
File size: 38kb
-
Matter: "In the present case
it could not be said and it was not seriously contended by
defence counsel ... that the accused did not have in his custody
or under his control the packages in question at the material
time, and by virtue of the said presumption under s 37(d) of the
Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, 1952"
-
Sebaya Sdn Bhd v Syarikat
Bekerjasama Ladang Kelapa Sawit Pegawai Negeri Pahang Bhd
[FCM]
-
File size: 30kb
-
Matter: "the Co-operative
asked for an interlocutory order that “all net proceeds from the
sale of oil palm fruits harvested from the plaintiff’s land, ...
and the net proceeds from the sale of such fruits received by
the first defendant on or after 1 December 1976 ..., without
prejudice to the rights of the parties in this action, be paid
into court"
-
C.H. Phang v PP [FCM]
-
File size: 52kb
-
Matter: "If our Constitution
makers had intended that their successors should not in any way
alter their handiwork, it would have been perfectly easy for
them to so provide; but nowhere in the Constitution does it
appear that that was their intention, even if they had been so
unrealistic as to harbour such intention."
-
Patinggi Abdul Rahman v
Abang Mohammad [HCM]
-
Ahmad Shah v PP [FCM]
-
PP v Rajamah [HCM]
|
[.... END OF 1979 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|