|
|
 |
Part
1
|
 |
Part
2
|
 |
Part
3
|
 |
Part 4
|
 |
Part
5
|
 |
Part
6
-
Case
No.:
-
Arumugam v Director
General of Inland Revenue [PC]
-
Krishnan v PP [FCM]
-
C.S. Wu v L.F. Wang
[CASg]
-
Selangor Omnibus Co Bhd v
Perumal [FCM]
-
File
size: 38kb
-
Matter: "The appellants
relied on these provisions to justify the dismissal. In their
view, the respondent had broken his contract of service. He
had no reasonable excuse for his absence from work, nor had he
informed or attempted to inform his employer of the excuse for
such absence"
-
Subramaniam v
Superintendent of Selarnag Park Drug Rehabilitation Centre
[CASg]
-
K.P. Goon v J&P Coats (M)
Bhd [FCM]
-
File
size: 85kb
-
Matter: "Mr Goon, the
workman, had his employment with the respondent company
terminated on the stated round of redundancy, ... He was given
one month’s notice and an ex-gratia payment ..."
-
Comptroller of Property
Tax v Sheefa Alkaff [HCSg]
-
W.M. Teong v P.C. Goh
[FCM]
-
S.S. Lok v S.K. Quek
[HCSg]
-
Vasudevan v T Damodaran
[FCM]
-
File
size: 37kb
-
Matter: "No notice of trial
has been given, no summons for directions issued, no discovery
made and no steps whatsoever taken to set the action down for
trial and proceed to a conclusive determination of the
proceedings – all this coming on to seven years after the
institution of the suit "
-
Halimah Hussain v
Collector of Land Revenue [FCM]
-
Central Provident Fund
Board v B.K. Ho [CASg]
-
File
size: 47kb
-
Matter: "respondent
contended before the arbitrator that such purported
determination was unjustified because, inter alia, the
procedure for determination required by the contract was not
followed and it is in this regard that the special case arises"
-
Malayan Bank Bhd v S.M.
Foo [FCM]
-
File
size: 55kb
-
Matter: "the Bank on 30
December 1978 applied for leave, as required by O 42 r 23,
Rules of the High Court, 1957 (now O 46 r 2(1)(a) Rules of the
High Court, 1980), to levy execution, since six years had
elapsed from the judgment"
-
C.K. Lai v K.S. Lee
[HCSg]
-
Alwee v K.F. Lai [FCM]
|
 |
Part
7
-
Case
No.:
-
Malayan Commercial Banks
Association v National Union of Bank Employees [FCM]
-
Chin Teck Plantations Bhd
v DGIR [FCM]
-
File
size: 69kb
-
Matter: "The appellant was
assessed with income tax in respect of $540,000 proceeds of
the sale of timber logs in the 6,976 KSK area. On appeal
before the Special Commissioners, they found the dominant
purpose of the appellant’s purchases of land was to sell
timber and to plant oil palms. They held that the proceeds of
sale of timber are gains "
-
Kota Kinabalu Industries
Sdn Bhd v DGIR [FCM]
-
File
size: 57kb
-
Matter: ""
-
Balakrishnan v Director
General of Public Services [FCM]
-
Y.S. Ng v Sykt Jiwa
Mentakab Sdn Bhd [FCM]
-
File
size: 21kb
-
Matter: "there has been no
compliance at all with the relevant statutory provision
requiring service of a copy of the record of appeal on the
respondents or their solicitors, let alone substantial
compliance – and this notwithstanding the respondents’
solicitors’ offer to accept service well out of time and even
to the extent of offering to collect the record themselves"
-
Collector of Land
Revenue, Kota Tinggi v UMBC Bhd [FCM]
-
Fadzil v Universiti
Technology Malaysia [FCM]
-
File
size: 38kb
-
Matter: "This appeal is
against the judgment of the learned judge dismissing an
application by the plaintiff (appellant before us) for summary
judgment in an action brought by the appellant against the
University ... for a declaration that the purported dismissal
by the respondents of the appellant was ultra vires,
illegal and void"
-
F.S. Loo v Chief District
Police [HCM]
-
File
size: 18kb
-
Matter: "In Earl Jowitt’s
Dictionary of English Law, a public document is defined as
“a document made for the purpose of the public making use of
it.” And that is exactly what police reports under s 107
[Criminal Procedure Code] are. If the right of the public to
have access to public documents is to be limited or curtailed,
then the legislature would have expressly so stated or it must
be established that it is contrary to public interest"
-
Pahang South Union
Omnibus Co Bhd v Minister of Labour [FCM]
-
Forest Development Sdn
Bhd v Sykt Permodalan dan Perusahaah Pahang Bhd [HCM]
-
Law Society v Harry Wee
[HCSg]
-
Kishabai v Jaikishan
[HCM]
-
File
size: 33kb
-
Matter: "In other words, the
legislature, viewing with sympathy any effort by a man to
provide for his wife and family after his death, has provided
that a man may insure his life at any time for their benefit
and any monies payable under the policy shall not go to pay
his debts, but shall be held in trust for his family"
-
-
Y.T. Goh v S.G. Tan
[HCSg]
-
Keng Soon Finance Bhd v
Comptroller of Customs [FCM]
|
[.... END OF 1981 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|