 |
Part
1
-
Case
No.
-
Malaysia v Gan [HCM]
-
File
size: 24kb
-
Matter:
"It is settled law that where the taxes become payable
under s 103(1) of the Act the court shall not entertain
any plea that the amount of tax sought to be recovered
is excessive, incorrectly assessed, under appeal or
incorrectly increased "
-
Plenitude Holdings Sdn Bhd v Khoo [HCM]
-
Penang Development Corporation v Teoh [HCM]
-
File
size: 51kb
-
Matter:
"whether the delay in the delivery of vacant possession
of the dwelling house which had been caused by the
contractor, who by government policy was a bumiputra
company, and who by the same policy, could not have had
its services terminated summarily, constituted
circumstances ‘beyond the control’ of the defendants "
-
Mawar Biru Sdn Bhd v Lim [HCM]
-
File
size: 22kb
-
Matter:
"By this, I mean whether there is a decrease in the
price of the said property after the same is offered for
sale subsequent to the caveat being lifted. However,
from the facts adduced before this court, I find no
evidence of any property value loss"
-
OCBC Ltd v Woo Hing Brothers (M) Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Eushun Properties Sdn Bhd v MBf Finance Bhd [SCM]
-
Azizah Abdul Ghani v Kuala Lumpur City Hall [SCM]
-
Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Development & Realtor Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
File
size: 48kb
-
Matter:
"in the three stages of a sale transaction, namely,
contract, completion and registration, I am here
concerned with the second stage. I am also concerned
with a case where the chargor accepts that although
there had been due compliance by the chargee with the
statutory conditions for a sale laid down in the Code
and it had exercised a legitimate power of sale, he
contends that the power had been exercised improperly
because the sale was at a gross undervalue"
-
Yap v PP [SCM]
-
Emar Sdn Bhd v Aidigi Sdn Bhd [SCM]
-
File
size: 92kb
-
Matter:
"By way of alternative, the judge went on to hold that
even if he were wrong in declaring the three debentures
null and void, the appointment of the receivers and
managers was bad in law because three separate
conditions precedent for their appointment under the
first debenture had not been complied "
-
Sri Hartamas Development Sdn Bhd v MBf Finance Bhd [SCM]
-
File
size: 34kb
-
Matter:
"Counsel contended that the demand was bad because under
s 218(2)(a), a company is by law entitled to have three
weeks after service of the demand to either pay, secure
or compound the sum demanded"
-
Uvarajah v Director General of Labour [SCM]
-
Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Sdn Bhd v Kathirvelu [SCM]
-
File
size: 53kb
-
Matter:
"38 days after the second accident, the plaintiff gave
written notice to the defendant informing it of the two
accidents. The defendant replied by letter ...
forwarding a claim form for completion and return within
14 days ... The plaintiff was unable to complete that
form as all the doctors were unable to diagnose his
condition ..."
-
Hong Leong Finance Bhd v Cheong [HCM]
-
File
size: 18kb
-
Matter:
"This is an application by a bankrupt seeking, in
effect, to have reversed what tantamounts to a refusal
by the official assignee to sanction his applying to the
Kuala Lumpur sessions court to have the judgment in
default against him on which the bankruptcy petition was
founded, set aside"
-
Rhina Bhar v Koid [HCM]
|