|
|
 |
Part
1
-
Case
No.
-
Sukma v Director General of Prison [FCM]
-
File
size: 36kb
-
Matter:
"appeal centred on art 121 of the Federal
Constitution, ... [A]ppellant contended that the
sessions court had no jurisdiction to try the appellant
for committing an act of gross indecency, an offence
under s 377D of the Penal Code because the offence of
‘liwat’ is triable by the syariah court."
-
W.M. Chua v K.K. Wong [HCM]
-
File
size: 31kb
-
Matter:
"The present predicament as I see it, is created
when the jurisdiction of the sessions court was amended
to award an unlimited amount in the case of running down
matters, such as the present case, but the scale of
costs under O 48 r 12 of the SCR has not been amended
accordingly."
-
Abdullah Hishan v Sharma [HCM]
-
File
size: 38kb
-
Matter:
"It was the contention of the
defendant that since she would have to divorce her
husband in order to keep her promise to marry the
plaintiff, and since the plaintiff knew that she was
already married and since the plaintiff accepted such a
promise, the plaintiff’s claim being thus based on an
agreement that was illegal and against public policy, is
therefore void and unenforceable."
-
Akitek Tenggara Sdn Bhd v Mid Valley City Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
S.H. Ji v Malaysia [HCSS]
-
File
size: 44kb
-
Matter:
"His application for optional retirement from the
department was approved ... vide a letter dated 27 May
1997 which letter also informed the plaintiff that the
payment of the monthly pension, ... is to be suspended
under s 26 [Statutory and Local Authorities Pensions Act
1980] ... The plaintiff is dissatisfied with the
suspension ... He commenced the present action."
-
Harris Salleh v M.F. Seck [CAM]
-
File
size: 113kb
-
Matter:
"In the court below the
plaintiff pleaded that the defendant was a bare trustee
and held the said land on trust for the said club. For
the defendant, it was said that there was an absence of
evidence ... that the defendant had been paid any money
or any consideration for the said land or that the
defendant had in any way been compensated for the said
land by the plaintiff ..."
-
Normala Samsuddin v Keluarga Communications Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Jamaluddin Hashim v Public Prosecutor [HCM]
-
Tycoon Realty Sdn Bhd v Senwara Development Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
Dr Munawar v Director General of Prison [HCM]
-
S.C. Fhong v C.C. Huan [HCM]
-
S.Y. Wu v Gunung Tunggal Quarry & Construction Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Penang Municipal
Council v Sungai Gelugor Multipurpose Co-op Society [FCM]
-
File
size: 293kb
-
Matter:
"the joint petition made it obvious to all
concerned in the Council that the Society would sell the
proposed units at prices well in excess of RM25,000.
Now, by virtue of condition (vii) of the planning
permission aforesaid, it was open to the Council at that
stage to have imposed a condition that the cost of 30%
of the units should not exceed RM25,000 each, yet it
studiously refrained from doing so"
-
Lori (M) Bhd v Arab-Malaysian Finance Bhd [FCM]
-
File
size: 103kb
-
Matter:
"In Chung Khiaw Bank Ltd v
Hotel Rasa Sayang Sdn Bhd (ibid), the
question whether a breach of s 67 of the [Companies Act]
has civil consequences, arose acutely for decision and,
therefore, we are obliged to undertake a review of it."
-
Workon Sdn Bhd v Director of Lands & Surveys, Sabah [HCSS]
|
 |
Part
2
-
Case
No.:
-
PP v H.Y. Chang [HCM]
-
File
size: 28kb
-
Matter:
"I was prompted to enter into
this inquiry by a report in The Star newspaper ... where
it was reported that the Penang High Court, in ruling
that '... it was clear that s 31(1) [Women and Girls
Protection Act 1973] provided that in the Peninsula,
only a sessions court was vested with the jurisdiction
to hear and dispose of cases under the Act', ..."
-
Abdul Razak v Shah Alam Properties Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
American International Assurance Co Ltd v
P.C. Lam [CAM]
-
Supreme Finance (M) Bhd v
H.H. Wing [CAM]
-
File
size: 42kb
-
Matter:
"in this country as in England, personal service on
the defendant is essential: O 10 r 1(1). However, this
rule is subject to certain exceptions. Personal service
on the defendant is exempted where the defendant’s
solicitor indorses on the writ that he accepts service
on behalf of the defendant ..."
-
Bencon Development Sdn Bhd v Penang Municipal Council [HCM]
-
File
size: 65kb
-
Matter:
"Learned assistant to the State
Legal Advisor, representing the second and third
defendants argued that the second and third defendants
should not have been made parties in the proceedings.
Regarding the second defendant (‘the PWD’) he argued
that it was no more than a government department with no
legal entity of its own."
-
OCBC Bank (M) Bhd v Registrar of Titles, Johore [CAM]
-
File
size: 88kb
-
Matter:
"Under s 340(2)(a) [National
Land Code 1965], the registered title of the proprietor
or the registered interest of the chargee or lessee
becomes defeasible where the registration was obtained
by fraud or misrepresentation, ..."
-
Yian Sdn Bhd v Mayor of Kuala Lumpur [HCM]
-
File
size: 52kb
-
Matter:
"Now that his decision is challenged, it is for
him, and him alone who should meet this challenge ... He
has the personal knowledge of the facts in issue. But he
chose not to do so. Instead Mr. Mokhtar, who had no
personal knowledge ... chose to do so on behalf of the
first respondent ..."
-
K.H. Khoo v P.H. Chor [CAM]
-
Sabah Berjaya Sdn Bhd v Director General of Inland Revenue
[CAM]
-
File
size: 49kb
-
Matter:
"before the High Court, the learned judge upheld
the deciding order of the Special Commissioners on only
one ground. He held that the donations by the appellant
to the Foundation were not a ‘gift’ within s 44(6)
[Income Tax Act 1967] because they were involuntary in
the sense that they were the product of compulsion."
-
Minister for Human Resources v Association of Bank
Officers [FCM]
-
File
size: 136kb
-
Matter:
"... appeals ..., from the decision of the Court of
Appeal, allowing the appeal of the Association ... from
the decision of the High Court, refusing an application
for an order of certiorari to quash the decision
of the Minister made under s 9(5) [Industrial Relations
Act 1967] that certain employees of Perwira Affin Bank
... who had been upgraded/promoted to the status of
internal officers had not thereby become officers
employed in an executive capacity ..."
-
Zainur Zakaria v PP [HCM]
-
File
size: 130kb
-
Matter:
"it is clear that a contempt
proceeding is far removed from the procedures as in a
normal trial ... It requires no complaint, there is no
charge, there is no trial in the strict sense of the
word, the rights of a person proceeded against are
restricted, it is arbitrary ..."
-
PhileoAllied Bank (M) Bhd v Bupinder Singh [CAM]
-
F.Y. Pang v K.S. Piong [HCM]
-
MAS Golden Boutique Sdn Bhd v Md Zain [HCM]
-
Interscope Versicherung Sdn Bhd v Sime Axa Assurance Bhd [CAM]
|
 |
Part
3
-
Case
No.:
-
L.C. Ding v Y.J. Yap [HCM]
-
PP v S.H. Chua [HCSS]
-
File
size: 149kb
-
Matter:
"The defence contended, and the lower court agreed, that s 90
[Securities Industry Act 1983]
covers only persons who are or were government or public service officers and not managing or other directors of public listed companies."
-
Tapah Bangkol v Superintendant of Lands and Surveys [HCSS]
-
Ratus Mesra Sdn Bhd v Shaik Osman Majid [HCM]
-
Buang Mohamad v Awang Jimat [HCSS]
-
File
size: 68kb
-
Matter:
"plaintiff is seeking a declaration that all the
dealings, transactions and the instruments relating
thereto on that parcel of land ... involving all the
defendants are null and void for contravention of the
title conditions of the said land or by reason of fraud
or that they are unconscionable ..."
-
HSBC (M) Trustee Bhd v K.H. Kong [HCM]
-
E.E. Lee v Mary Lee [CAM]
-
File
size: 35kb
-
Matter:
"If he was sued for breach of fiduciary duty or for
breach of trust, then he should have been cited as
defendant either in his own name or in his
representative capacity as an executor of the estate of
the deceased. But, here, the defendant was sued as a
director of Lee Guat Cheow & Co Sdn Bhd."
-
The Land Administrator, Petaling District v Swee Lin Sdn Bhd [CAM]
-
Sunrise Bhd v L&M Agencies Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Daewoo Corp v Bauer (M) Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Stephen Bong v FCB (M) Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
File
size: 22kb
-
Matter:
"an application for an order of certiorari by
Stephen Bong, ..., to quash the Industrial Court’s
Award ... which held that the termination of the
applicant’s service with the respondent company was
with just cause and excuse on the ground of redundancy."
-
K.L. Booi v Min for Human Resources [HCM]
-
Fasda Heights Sdn Bhd v Soon Ee Sing Construction Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Yusai v PP [HCM]
-
File
size: 24kb
-
Matter:
"In England, prior to 1933, children could testify
in criminal proceedings only if they were found
competent to swear the same oath as adult witnesses.
Section 38 of the English Act first introduced the
principle of unsworn evidence in criminal cases."
-
C.C. Beh v Paloh Medial Centre Sdn Bhd [HCM]
|
 |
Part
4
-
Case
No.:
-
Penerbitan Pelangi Sdn Bhd v Pan Alliance Sdn Bhd [HCSS]
-
Hock Hua Bank Bhd v
M.C. Choo [HCSS]
-
Jasa Keramat Sdn Bhd v Monatech (M) Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
File
size: 86kb
-
Matter:
"Summing up, Ms Lim said that
the plaintiff has more than an arguable case, that the
risk of dissipation is evinced by the conduct of the
defendant, and that the balance of convenience is in
favour of the grant of the injunction."
-
Filotek Trading Sdn Bhd v Buildcon-Cimaco Concrete Sdn Bhd [HCM]
-
Anwar Ibrahim v Dr Mahathir Mohamad [HCM]
-
File
size: 46kb
-
Matter:
"It is the plaintiff's case that
..., the defendant, ..., falsely and maliciously spoke
and published to a crowd of journalists ... of and
concerning the plaintiff and accused the plaintiff of
homosexuality."
-
B.P. Fehrenbach v
Official Receiver [HCM]
-
File
size: 66kb
-
Matter:
"In a derivative action, the plaintiff usually
seeks to enforce a cause of action which belongs to the
company and not to him personally and the court can, ...
order the company to indemnify him for his costs ..."
-
Perwira Habib Bank (M) Bhd v
Megat Najmuddin [HCM]
-
File
size: 55kb
-
Matter:
"The plaintiff contends that the first letter, ...,
contained the defendants’ advice that a lien-holder’s
caveat would be sufficient security for the disbursement
of the first overdraft facility ..."
-
Fenghua Development Sdn Bhd v Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd [HCM]
-
Hiebert v Chandra Sri Ram [CAM]
-
File
size: 170kb
-
Matter:
"The respondent alleges that the contents of the
article, ..., amounts to serious contempt of the said
court and an unwarranted attack upon the Malaysian
Judiciary. Consequently, the respondent made an ex-parte
application for leave of the said court to issue a
committal order ..."
-
N.P. Lee v PP [HCM]
-
H.C. Sam v PP [CAM]
-
Kang Wah Construction Sdn Bhd v Chan Ai Min Property Sdn Bhd [HCSS]
-
Sainal Abidin Mading v PP [CAM]
-
Coke & Coal Products (M) Sdn Bhd v S.K. Hon [HCM]
-
File
size: 33kb
-
Matter:
"Counsel for the fourth defendant submitted that
the award so made was misconceived in law, inter alia,
on the ground that there was no evidence of actual
damage suffered by the plaintiffs in consequence of the
said caveat being lodged ..."
-
PP v Sukumaran [HCM]
-
File
size: 79kb
-
Matter:
"In Arulpragasan Sandaraju v
PP ..., Edgar Joseph Jr FCJ perceptively observed
that 'the expression ''a prima facie case'' is
nowhere to be found in the [pre-Act A979] Code'. But
now, the tables have turned, ..."
|
 |
Part 5
|
 |
Part 6
|
 |
Part 7
|
[....
END OF 1999 ....]
all rights reserved
taiking.thing pte ltd
|
|
|