|
|
 |
Part
1
|
 |
Part
2
|
 |
Part
3
|
 |
Part
4
|
 |
Part
5
-
Case
No.
-
Smith v Bridgend CBC [HL]
-
Great-West Life & Annuity
Insurance Co v Knudson [USSC]
-
File
size: 89kb
-
Matter:
insurance - recovery of insurance money by insurer - insurance
plan taken out by employer for health & welfare of
employees has reimbursement provision - the provision allowed
insurer to recover insurance money from beneficiary in cases
where the beneficiary is entitled to recover from third party
- Knudson was covered by the plan - he was riding in a Hyundai
car at the time of the accident - his suit against Hyundai
& other tortfeasors ended in a negotiated settlement
payout - the payout included an allocated sum for the insurer
under the reimbursement provision - insurer contested the
reimbursement sum allocated under the settlement payout -
insurer filed action under s.503(a)(3), ERISA - whether
insurer can rely on s.503(a)(3) to enforcement reimbursement
provision.
-
Canada v Singleton [SCC]
-
Auckland District Law Society v
Russell McVeagh McKenzie Bartleet & Co [NZCA]
-
Brewin Dolphine Bell Lawrie v
Philips [HL]
-
Arrowtown Assets Ltd v
Collector of Stamp Revenue [DCHK]
-
Toyota Motor Manufacturing Inc
v Williams [USSC]
-
File
size: 51kb
-
Matter:
"Respondent, claiming to be disabled because of her
carpal tunnel syndrome and other related impairments, sued
petitioner, her former employer, for failing to provide her
with a reasonable accommodation as required by the Americans
with Disability Act 1990."
-
Moltoni Corpn Pty Ltd v QBE
Insurance Ltd [HCA]
-
File
size: 39kb
-
Matter:
"Section 54 of the Insurance
Contracts Act 1984 provides that, in some circumstances, an
insurer may not refuse to pay a claim, even if the contract of
insurance would permit that refusal, but that the insurer's
liability in respect of the claim is reduced."
-
Van de Perre v Edwards [SCC]
-
Owasso Independent School
District v Falvo [USSC]
-
File
size: 29kb
-
Matter:
"Teachers sometimes ask students to
score each other’s tests, papers, .... Respondent contends
[that] .... peer grading, violates the Family Educational
Rights and Privacy Act of 1974."
-
Barclays Bank Plc v Buhr [CAEW]
-
Fulton v Woods [NZCA]
-
Frost
v Warner [HCA]
-
539938
Ontario Ltd v Derksen [SCC]
-
Dal-Sterling
Group Plc v WSP South & West Ltd [QBD]
|
 |
Part
6
|
 |
Part
7
|
 |
Part
8
-
Case
No.:
-
Thompson v Western States Medical Center [USSC]
-
Commerce Commission v Southern Cross Medical Care Society [NZCA]
-
File
size: 160kb
-
Matter:
".... the ultimate question in this case is whether
Southern Cross’ acquisition of Aetna will, or is likely to,
place it in a dominant position in the medical insurance
market in New Zealand, or strengthen an already dominant
position ...."
-
Ka Wah Bank Ltd v Moorjani [CFA]
-
BT Plc v Caledonia North Sea Ltd [HL]
-
File
size: 148kb
-
Matter:
".... conflagration which destroyed
the Piper Alpha oil platform .... cost the lives of many ....
[C]laims made by and on behalf of the victims were fully
settled years ago. These proceedings are the contractual
aftermath of those settlements, brought to decide who, ....,
must bear the financial cost of the settlements."
-
Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd [HCA]
-
File
size: 221kb
-
Matter:
".... appellant suffered serious injury to an eye while
playing indoor cricket. The game was being played at a
facility, owned and operated, as a business, by the
respondent."
-
Prevost-Masson v General Trust of Canada [SCC]
-
File
size: 61kb
-
Matter:
".... appeal raises the issues of the accountant's
professional liability, the quantum of damages, and the nature
of the relationship, if such there is, between the
accountant's liability and the liabilities of certain of
Perras' debtors ...."
-
Ahmed v Habib Bank Ltd [CAEW]
-
Dunmore v Ontario [SCC]
-
Interactive Investor Ltd v Totalise Plc [CAEW]
-
Grovit v Turner [HL]
-
Analog Devices BV v Zurich Insurance Co [SCIre]
-
Porter v Nussle [USSC]
-
Half Moon Bay Ltd v Crown Eagle Hotels Ltd [PC]
-
Flywin Co Ltd v Strong & Associates Ltd [CFA]
-
Risk v The Northern Territory of Australia [HCA]
|
 |
Part
9
-
Case
No.:
-
Professional Contractors' Group v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [CAEW]
-
Hendry v The World Professional Billiards & Snooker Association Ltd [Ch.D]
-
Kahn v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [HL]
-
File
size: 67kb
-
Matter:
"Despite the fact that the company
received no interest from TEE after the liquidation date, it
is in principle liable to pay corporation tax as if it had.
Section 8(2) [Icome and Corporation Taxes Act 1988] provides
that a company is "chargeable to corporation tax on
profits arising in the winding up of the company"."
-
Shum v HK [CFA]
-
Ark Aviation Ltd v Newton [NZCA]
-
Morrill, Dr v Krangle [SCC]
-
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc v Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al. [USSC]
-
ABC Containerline NV v Holt Cargo Systems Inc [SCC]
-
Mother of P (a child) v
Secretary of State for Health [HL]
-
Heath v US [PC]
-
Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd [SCC]
-
Ryanair Ltd v AER Rianta CPT [SCIre]
-
File
size: 77kb
-
Matter:
"Landing charges and passenger load
fees are payable by airlines using the facilities of airports,
.... Pursuant to the provisions of [the Air Navigation and
Transport (Amendment) Act, 1998, s.39], Aer Rianta is entitled
to recover these charges as a simple contract debt."
-
AG v N [NZCA]
-
File
size: 39kb
-
Matter:
".... an appeal against a decision of the Employment
Court upholding the common law claim by the respondent, Ms N,
of constructive dismissal from her civilian employment at
Waiouru Military Camp in the aftermath of a sexual harassment
complaint by Ms N."
-
White v NZ Stock Exchange
[NZCA]
-
Clear Focus Imaging Inc v Contra Vision Ltd [Ch.D]
-
File
size: 22kb
-
Matter:
"case concerns an application by
the patentee, .... to amend the specification of its
patent .... The amendment is opposed by the current
appellants, .... [Hearing Officer] refused the initially
proposed amendments but indicated that revised proposals
might be satisfactory. The patentee went along .... but
the opponent did not, continuing to seek outright refusal."
|
 |
Part
10
-
Case
No.:
-
US v Craft [USSC]
-
File
size: 74kb
-
Matter:
".... whether a tenant by the entirety
possesses “property” or “rights to property” to which
a federal tax lien may attach. Relying on the state law
fiction that a tenant by the entirety has no separate interest
in entireties property, the United States Court of Appeals
[6th Circuit] held that such property is exempt from the tax
lien."
-
Shergold v Tanner [HCA]
-
Guignard v St-Hyacinthe City [SCC]
-
Pelling, Dr v Families Need Fathers Ltd [CAEW]
-
File
size: 41kb
-
Matter:
"The Registrar dismissed Dr Pelling's
application [under Companies Act 1985, s.356(6)] for an order
against [the respondent company] ....Dr Pelling sought an
order directing that a copy of part of the register of members
be sent to Dr Pelling in accordance with a requirement made by
him on the Company
...."
-
Bristow Helicopters Ltd v King [HL]
-
File
size: 287kb
-
Matter:
"I see no occasion for limiting article 17 [Warsaw
Convention] to bodily injuries which are 'palpable and
conspicuous', .... The brain is part of the body. Injury
to a passenger's brain is an injury to a passenger's body
.... Whether injury to a part of a person's body has
occurred is, .... essentially a question of medical
evidence."
-
Kinoos Sons Ltd v Hossen Abdool [PC]
-
Paul Chen v Lord Energy Ltd [CFA]
-
File
size: 49kb
-
Matter:
"The issue presently before this Court
is how the loss, if any, which the purchaser has suffered as a
result of the stay of the order for specific performance
granted by the Court of Appeal is to be assessed."
-
Sweeney v Macmillan Publisher Ltd [Ch.D]
-
File
size: 174kb
-
Matter:
"There is some material in the text of
the Reader's Edition which was not included in any edition of
Ulysses published during Joyce's lifetime. It is that which
gives rise to the need to consider separately material which
was, and that which was not, published during Joyce's
lifetime."
-
Member-in-charge, Terenure Garda Station v Clarke [SCIre]
-
Young v Oliver [NZCA]
-
Fuller v Strum [CAEW]
-
Firebelt Pty Ltd v Brambles Australia Ltd [HCA]
-
Allan v Clibbery [CAEW]
-
Land Transport Safety Authority v Casey [NZCA]
-
Ashcroft v America Civil Liberties Union [USSC]
|
 |
Part
11
-
Case
No.:
-
Harvey Corporation Ltd v Barker [NZCA]
-
File
size: 30kb
-
Matter:
"the Barkers had purchased the property in the reasonable
expectation that it was as portrayed in Harveys’
advertisements, with the entranceway within the legal
boundaries. They had paid $760,000 on this basis not knowing
that in order to remedy the defect they would be required to
pay a further sum."
-
Farrell v Eastern Health Board [SCIre]
-
Reliance Water Controls Ltd v Altecnic Ltd [CAEW]
-
Lee v Chan [HKHC]
-
Deakin v Faulding [Ch.D]
-
East Sussex CC v Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd [HL]
-
Yardley v Twinsectra Ltd [HL]
-
Garfoot, Dr v General Medical Council [PC]
-
New Brunswick v Mackin [SCC]
-
Minna Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust [CAEW]
-
File
size: 49kb
-
Matter:
"The Recorder granted that [strike out] application ....
He held that there was no tort of harassment at common law
before the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act
1997, ....; he further held that the complaints made against
the second defendant could not amount to the tort of
intentional infliction of harm under the principle in Wilkinson
v Downton."
-
Performance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd [SCC]
-
File
size: 91kb
-
Matter:
"Rectification is an equitable remedy
whose purpose is to prevent a written document from being used
as an engine of fraud or misconduct "equivalent to
fraud". The traditional rule was to permit rectification
only for mutual mistake, but rectification is now available
for unilateral mistake ...."
-
AXA Equity & Law Assurance Society Plc v Heaton [HL]
-
File
size: 107kb
-
Matter:
"if A, having sued B for damages for breach of
contract, enters into a settlement with B expressed to be
in full and final settlement of all its claims against B,
is A thereafter precluded from pursuing against C a claim
for damages for breach of another contract to the extent
that this claim is for damages which formed part of A's
claim against B?"
-
Cork Examiner Publications Ltd v Hill [SCIre]
-
Cashmere Enterprises Ltd v Mathias [NZCA]
-
Re McBain [HCA]
-
File
size: 367kb
-
Matter:
"The ordinary processes of appeal
not having been invoked, and the parties to the
proceedings before Sundberg J being content to accept
his decision, the question arises as to the capacity of
the applicants to have the decision quashed by certiorari.
That question requires consideration of the jurisdiction
of this Court which the applicants seek to invoke."
|
 |
Part
12
-
Case
No.:
-
Wilson v Anderson [HCA]
-
Pepsi-Cola v Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union [SCC]
-
Transamerica Life Insurance Co of Canada v Goulet [SCC]
-
Iraqi Airways Company v Kuwait Airways Corporation [HL]
-
V.C. v
P.G. [SCIre]
-
AG v Gilbert [NZCA]
-
Los Angeles v Alameda Books Inc [USSC]
-
File
size: 100kb
-
Matter:
"Los Angeles Municipal Code .... prohibits
“the establishment or maintenance of more than one adult
entertainment business in the same building, structure or
portion thereof.” Respondents, two adult establishments ....
in the same building, filed a suit .... alleging that [Code]
violates the First Amendment ...."
-
Ancare New Zealand Ltd v Fort Dodge New Zealand Ltd [PC]
-
File
size: 21kb
-
Matter:
"[Trial Judge] found that praziquantel
was a well known compound .... It had been patented by Bayer
but the patent expired .... It would therefore have been
obvious to anyone familiar with the prior art that if one
wanted a combined treatment for tapeworms and roundworms,
praziquantel and levasimole were well worth trying. "
-
Alphasense Ltd v City Technology Ltd [CAEW]
-
Association of Pharmaceutical Importers v Secretary of State
for Health [CAEW]
-
File
size: 58kb
-
Matter:
"appellants sought, ...., an order quashing the
modulation provisions contained in .... the 1999
Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme .... including a
declaration that the modulation provisions were unlawful and
an injunction preventing the Secretary of State from giving
effect to those provisions."
-
Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [HL]
-
File
size: 379kb
-
Matter:
"A and B owed C a duty to protect C against a risk of
a particular and very serious kind. They failed to perform
that duty. As a result the risk eventuated and C suffered
.... Had there been only one tortfeasor, C would have been
entitled to recover, but because the duty owed to him was
broken by two tortfeasors and not only one, he is held to
be entitled to recover against neither, because of his
inability to prove what is scientifically unprovable."
-
St-Jean v Mercier [SCC]
-
Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd v Special Commissioner [HL]
-
Tame v New South Wales [HCA]
-
Times Newspapers Ltd v Louchansky [CAEW]
-
File
size: 138kb
-
Matter:
"appeals raise interesting and important questions ....
as to the correct approach to qualified privilege following
.... Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127,
the proper construction of s4A of the Limitation Act 1980 in
the context of internet publication, the scope of general
damages for defamation under Russian law, ...."
|
 |
Part
13
-
Case
No.:
-
Sherwood v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [CAEW]
-
Old Etonian Housing Association Ltd v O'Connor [CAEW]
-
Jennings v Rice [CAEW]
-
File
size: 75kb
-
Matter:
"Mr. Jennings’s claim against the
estate was pleaded in three ways. First, a claim under the
Inheritance Act 1975, second in contract, and third under the
doctrine of proprietary estoppel. The judge rejected the
claims under the Inheritance Act and for breach of contract,
but found for Mr. Jennings under the doctrine of proprietary
estoppel."
-
Rothschild Asset Management Ltd v Ako [CAEW]
-
Crampton v Junior [CAEW]
-
Agnew v Agapitos [CAEW]
-
Financial Times Ltd v Interbrew SA [CAEW]
-
A v B & C [CAEW]
-
File
size: 91kb
-
Matter:
"A is a footballer .... B is a
national newspaper. C is one of two women with whom A, ....
had affairs. The injunction was granted to restrain B from
publishing the stories which C and the other woman, D, had
sold to B ...."
-
Prolife Alliance v BBC [CAEW]
-
File
size: 112kb
-
Matter:
"case is about the censorship of political speech. It
concerns the question, what constraints may lawfully be
imposed upon the choice of a registered political party as
to the content of a party election broadcast to be
transmitted on television on its behalf at the time of a
general election."
-
Gough v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [CAEW]
-
B v H & A (Children) [CAEW]
-
Premier Luggage & Bags Ltd v The Premier Co (UK) Ltd [CAEW]
-
Stevens v Plymouth City Council [CAEW]
-
File
size: 81kb
-
Matter:
"At issue is how C’s interest in preserving the
confidentiality of personal information about himself is to be
reconciled with his mother’s interest, as his nearest
relative, in having access to enough information about him to
exercise her statutory functions under the Mental Health Act."
-
Police Complaints Authority v
Green [CAEW]
-
Shierson v Tomlinson [CAEW]
|
 |
Part
14
-
Case
No.:
-
HM Coroner for West Somersetshire v Middleton [CAEW]
-
File
size: 162kb
-
Matter:
"appeals concern the extent to which there is a duty
on the State to conduct an investigation into the death of
an individual where it is alleged that, exercising
reasonable care, the State could and should have prevented
the death."
-
Wooder v Dr Feggetter [CAEW]
-
File
size: 54kb
-
Matter:
"an application by the claimant .... for judicial review
of a decision of Dr Craig Stewart Feggetter, ...., to the
effect that he should be given medical treatment for a
psychiatric condition against his will."
-
Davis v Balfour Kilpatrick Ltd [CAEW]
-
Sussex Ambulance NHS Trust v King [CAEW]
-
Mrs. U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine [CAEW]
-
Bessant v South Cone Incorporated [CAEW]
-
File
size: 67kb
-
Matter:
".... the first issue .... the nature
of an appeal under s.76 of the [Trademarks Act 1994], and the
function of the appellate judge ....The second and third
issues are whether the appellate judge, .... erred in his
decision to reverse the Registrar’s decision ...."
-
Elton John v Price Waterhouse [CAEW]
-
-
Mother of S (a child) v Father [CAEW]
-
McManus v Victoria Beckham [CAEW]
-
File
size: 93kb
-
Matter:
".... claimants allege that .... the defendant came into
their shop and in a rude, loud and unreasonable way advised
the three customers present that the autograph on a photograph
of her husband, David Beckham, was a fake."
-
The Parole Board v Giles [CAEW]
-
File
size: 65kb
-
Matter:
"where a criminal is convicted or pleads guilty ....,
and is sentenced to a period of imprisonment which the
court considers commensurate with the gravity of his
offence, .... However, the position is different where the
detention, ...., is not to punish but to protect the
public from harm ...."
-
Temple v South Manchester Health Authority [CAEW]
-
Emerald Meats (London) Ltd v AIB Group (UK) Plc [CAEW]
-
File
size: 40kb
-
Matter:
"The customer had a current account
with the bank .... There was an agreed overdraft facility,
.... on the many occasions when a cheque drawn on a different
bank was paid into its account, when the account was
overdrawn, it was charged interest on the sum representing the
value of the cheque for a day longer than they should have
been."
-
-
File
size: 83kb
-
Matter:
""
-
|
[....
END OF 2002 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|