|
|
 |
Part
1
-
Case
No.:
-
Father of J (a child) v Mother [HL]
-
Impregilo SpA v Lesotho Highlands Development Authority [HL]
-
Fishermen & Friends of the Sea v Environment Management Authority of Trinidad & Tobago [PC]
-
Biolyse Pharma Corporation v Canada [SCC]
-
Canada v Vaid [SCC]
-
File
size: 156kb
-
Matter:
"The former Speaker of the House of Commons .... is accused of constructively
dismissing his chauffeur, ...., for reasons that
amount to workplace discrimination and harassment under the
Canadian Human Rights Act ...."
-
Ng v Max Share Ltd [CFA]
-
Noise Control Authority v Step In Ltd [CFA]
-
Fyffes Plc v DCC Plc [SCIre]
-
Kennedy v Law Society of Ireland [SCIre]
-
File
size: 59kb
-
Matter:
".... “two-pronged investigation”.
One prong of the investigation .... whether the appellant had complied with the Accounts
Regulations. That was the only disclosed purpose of the
investigation. The other prong, however, which was not
originally disclosed, was the investigation of suspect
litigation processed by the appellant ...."
-
Johnson v California [USSC]
-
Smith v Massachusetts [USSC]
-
Anjaleem Enterprises Pvt Ltd v Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad [SCInd]
-
File
size: 64kb
-
Matter:
"the appellant has claimed exemption, therefore, the
burden was on the appellant to show that the programmed EPROM
constituted a "recorded media" under tariff item
85.24 .... [The] matter was examined by the department which
came to the conclusion that EPROM was basically a chip or an
IC classifiable under tariff item ...."
-
Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd [NZSC]
-
Povey v Qantas Airways Ltd [HCA]
-
File
size: 215kb
-
Matter:
".... [appellant] alleged that, "[d]uring the course
of or following the flights" from Sydney to London and
return, he suffered from deep venous thrombosis
("DVT") caused by.... what was said to be cramped
seating from which it was not easy to move, ...."
-
Ame v Min for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [HCA]
|
 |
Part
2
-
Case
No.:
-
Mark v Mark [HL]
-
Spectrum Plus Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [HL]
-
Commissioner of Police v Cavanaugh [PC]
-
Smith & Nephew Inc v Glegg [SCC]
-
Chaoulli v Quebec [SCC]
-
Intellectuals Forum v State of Andhra Pradesh [SCInd]
-
File
size: 112kb
-
Matter:
".... at a jurisprudential level, it
falls on this court to lay down the law regarding the use of
public lands or natural resources, which have a direct link to
the environment of a particular area, by the Government."
-
Li v Bank of China (HK) Ltd [CFA]
-
File
size: 63kb
-
Matter:
".... [appellant] claimed to be
entitled to rescind the mortgages .... she had been procured
to enter into them either by misrepresentations .... or by the
undue influence of Mr. Li .... The Bank, it was said, had
actual or constructive notice of these improprieties."
-
Manchester City FC plc v Royle [CAEW]
-
Igen Ltd v Kay Wong [CAEW]
-
Stewart v Dutra Construction Co [USSC]
-
Brown v Payton [USSC]
-
Rosenstein v State of Israel [SCIsr]
-
File
size: 319kb
-
Matter:
"An Israeli citizen is wanted in the
United States, .... The State of Israel, in which he is
present and in which the conspiracy was made, is being asked,
on the basis of the extradition treaty between the two states,
to extradite him."
-
Saxena v Pandit [SCInd]
-
Fingleton v The Queen [HCA]
-
Polyaire Pty Ltd v K-Aire Pty Ltd [HCA]
-
File
size: 69kb
-
Matter:
"a person .... infringe the monopoly in a registered design if, without the licence or authority of the owner, that person
.... 'applies the design or any fraudulent or obvious imitation of it to any article in respect of which the design is registered.'"
|
 |
Part
3
-
Case
No.:
-
Khadir v Sec of State for Home Department [HL]
-
Carson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [HL]
-
Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [PC]
-
GreCon Dimter Inc v JR Normand Inc [SCC]
-
Provincial Court Judges' Association of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Min of Justice) [SCC]
-
Sec of Justice v Bernard Lau [CFA]
-
File
size: 101kb
-
Matter:
".... questions concerning the validity of
provisions of the Public Officers Pay Adjustment
Ordinance, and the Public Officers Pay Adjustments
(2004/2005) Ordinance, which purported to reduce the pay
of public officers, and .... whether the Ordinances are
in breach of .... the Basic Law"
-
Lo v Hong Kong Housing Authority [CFA]
-
File
size: 57kb
-
Matter:
"whether [the respondent Housing Authority] has the
power to dispose of .... retail and carpark facilities
within its housing estates to the Link Real Estate
Investment Trust .... The issue concerns the legal
capacity of the Authority and turns on the proper
interpretation of the Housing Ordinance, ...."
-
SB v Denbigh High School [CAEW]
-
File
size: 109kb
-
Matter:
"an appeal by SB against an order made by Bennett J
.... whereby he dismissed her application for judicial
review of a decision of the Headteacher and Governors of
Denbigh High School, .... who had refused to allow her
to attend the School if she was not willing to comply
with their school uniform requirements."
-
Precis (521) plc v William M Mercer Ltd [CAEW]
-
File
size: 144kb
-
Matter:
"Precis contends that Mercer
owed it a duty of care with respect to .... the Acturial
Valuation Report, ... and that accordingly Mercer is
liable .... for professional negligence .... Mercer
denies that it owed a duty of care .... [and] that by
virtue of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act
1999 it is entitled to rely on the exclusion clause in
the Confidential Agreement."
-
City of Sherrill, NY v Oneida Indian Nation of NY [USSC]
-
File
size: 77kb
-
Matter:
"[the Tribe] resists the payment of property taxes
to Sherrill on the ground that [its] acquisition of fee
title to discrete parcels of historic reservation land
revived the [Tribe's] ancient sovereignty ....
Consequently, the Tribe maintains, regulatory authority
.... no longer resides in Sherrill."
-
Jackson v Birmingham Board of Education [USSC]
-
Fennell v Dublin City Council [SCIre]
-
Herut v Chairman for General Elections Committee for the Sixteenth Knessett [SCIsr]
-
File
size: 64kb
-
Matter:
"Herut approached .... Justice M. Cheshin
[Elections Committee Chairman] .... requesting that he
approve the following jingle for broadcast on radio,
during the time set aside for election propaganda
broadcasting, ...."
-
Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson [HCA]
-
Roncevich v Repatriation Commission [HCA]
-
File
size: 143kb
-
Matter:
".... meaning of .... "defence-caused",
"defence service" and "arose out of, or
was attributable to, any defence service" as used
in sub-ss (1) and (5) of s 70 of the Veterans'
Entitlement Act 1986 (Cth)"
|
 |
Part
4
-
Case
No.:
-
Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Autologic Holdings Plc [HL]
-
File
size: 171kb
-
Matter:
"In 2002 Marks & Spencer Plc
appealed against the refusal of group relief, on the
ground that these statutory limitations on the
territorial scope of group relief were incompatible
with, and overridden by, Community law .... other
international groups of companies showed interest in
following Marks & Spencer's lead .... Inland Revenue
[contends that] .... the loss relief group litigation
.... are not properly justiciable in the High Court.
Claims for group relief should be made to an inspector
of taxes. If he wrongly refuses a claim the taxpayer
should appeal to the General or Special Commissioners."
-
Kehoe v Sec of State for Work & Pensions [HL]
-
File
size: 124kb
-
Matter:
"[Mrs. Kehoe] contends that, ...., the Child
Support Act 1991 gives her a right to recover financial
support for the children from Mr. Kehoe and that the
provisions of the Act purporting to deny her a power of
direct enforcement against him are inconsistent with
.... article 6 of the European Convention on Human
Rights."
-
Jagdeo Singh v Trinidad & Tobago [PC]
-
R v Hamilton [SCC]
-
R v Marshall [SCC]
-
File
size: 145kb
-
Matter:
"Can members of the Mi’kmaq
people in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick engage in
commercial logging on Crown lands without authorization,
contrary to statutory regulation? More precisely, do
they have treaty rights or aboriginal title entitling
them to do so?"
-
PCCW-HKT Telephone Ltd v The Telecommunications Authority [CFA]
-
River Trade Terminal Co Ltd v Secretary for Justice [CFA]
-
File
size: 57kb
-
Matter:
"appellant began to allow .... “intra-Asia
vessels”, .... to berth and to discharge and load
their cargoes at the RTT. This, the government contends,
is a breach of [Special Condition] 16."
-
Robertson v Dept for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs [CAEW]
-
R v Konzani [CAEW]
-
File
size: 69kb
-
Matter:
"In November 2000, the appellant was informed that
he was HIV positive .... he was specifically informed of
the risks of passing the infection on to any sexual
partners, and its dire consequences. Thereafter he had
sexual relationships the three complainants."
-
Muehler v Mena [USSC]
-
File
size: 51kb
-
Matter:
"We hold that Mena’s detention in handcuffs for
the length of the search was consistent with our opinion
in Michigan v Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), and
that the officers’ questioning during that detention
did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights."
-
City of Rancho Palos v Abrams [USSC]
-
File
size: 53kb
-
Matter:
"When a federal statute creates
a new right but fails to specify whether plaintiffs may
or may not recover damages or attorney’s fees, we must
fill the gap in the statute’s text by examining all
relevant evidence .... The inquiry varies from statute
to statute. Sometimes the question is whether, despite
its silence, Congress intended us to recognize an
implied cause of action."
-
JF v DPP [SCIre]
-
File
size: 52kb
-
Matter:
".... applicant obtained leave from the High Court
to apply, by way of judicial review, for an order
restraining the respondent from proceeding with the
prosecution, essentially on the ground of delay ....
[The] prosecutor filed a Statement of Opposition ...."
-
Assn for Civil Rights in Israel v Chairman of General Elections Committee for the 16th Knessett [SCIsr]
-
File
size: 48kb
-
Matter:
"[Chairman of the Central Elections Committee]
disqualified segments of two of Raam’s and Balad’s
election propaganda broadcasts which displayed the
Palestinian flag. [The] Association for Civil Rights in
Israel, approached this Court with a petition for the
invalidation of the Chairman's decision ...."
-
-
Bankstown City Council v Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd [HCA]
|
 |
Part
5
-
Case
No.:
-
Sentence Review Commissioners v McClean [HL]
-
Roberts v The Parole Board [HL]
-
File
size: 294kb
-
Matter:
".... whether the Parole Board, ...., is able,
within the .... Criminal Justice Act 1991, and
compatibly with article 5 of the European Convention
.... (a) to withhold material
relevant to the appellant's parole review from the
appellant's legal representatives and instead (b) to
disclose that material to a specially appointed
advocate, who would represent the appellant ...."
-
Marlborough Aquaculture Ltd v The Chief Executive, Ministry of Fisheries [PC]
-
Orbanski v Canada [SCC]
-
File
size: 116kb
-
Matter:
"whether police officers were authorized to ask the
drivers about their prior alcohol consumption and, ....,
to request the performance of sobriety tests at the
roadside without first informing the driver of his right
to counsel"
-
Canada v Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd [SCC]
-
File
size: 39kb
-
Matter:
"It is now well established that
court proceedings are presumptively “open” in
Canada. Public access will be barred only when the
appropriate court, in the exercise of its discretion,
concludes that disclosure would subvert the ends of
justice or unduly impair its proper administration."
-
Smith v City of Jackson, Mississippi [USSC]
-
File
size: 110kb
-
Matter:
"Petitioners, .... contend that
salary increases received in 1999 violated the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 because they
were less generous to officers over the age of 40 ....
[Suit] raises the question whether the
“disparate-impact” theory of recovery announced in Griggs
v Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), for cases
brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
is cognizable under the ADEA."
-
Bates v Dow Agroscience LLC [USSC]
-
File
size: 75kb
-
Matter:
"Petitioners [Texas peanut
farmers] allege that .... their crops were severely
damaged by the application of respondent’s newly
marketed pesticide named “Strongarm.” .... whether
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
pre-empts their state-law claims for damages."
-
National Association of Health Stores v
Department of Health [CAEW]
-
Layla Uddin (a child) v Birmingham City Council [CAEW]
-
Crompton BV v Leo Laboratories Ltd [SCIre]
-
File
size: 58kb
-
Matter:
"If the claim is not properly made under Article
5(3), the Irish courts have no jurisdiction ....
Alternatively, if the contract contains a term
conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Dutch Courts,
that will prevail over any claimed special jurisdiction
pursuant to Article 5."
-
Upadhyay v State of Andhra Pradesh [SCInd]
-
File
size: 77kb
-
Matter:
"Presently, we are considering mainly the issue of
directions for the development of children who are in
jail with their mothers, who are in jail either as
under-trial prisoners or convicts. Children, for none of
their fault, but per force, have to stay in jail with
their mothers."
-
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v Union of India [SCInd]
-
Sungsuwan v The Queen [SCNZ]
-
Jarratt v Commissioner of Police of NSW [HCA]
-
File
size: 224kb
-
Matter:
"The issues concern the application of the
requirements of natural justice to the removal of Mr.
Jarratt from the office of Deputy Commissioner, ....,
and the consequences of a failure to comply with those
requirements."
-
Ruddock v Taylor [HCA]
-
File
size: 262kb
-
Matter:
"Following each decision to
cancel his visa, the appellant was detained in
immigration detention. The first period of detention
lasted 161 days, the second 155 days. For some time
during each period of detention he was kept in prison
.... After his release he brought action .... claiming
damages for false imprisonment."
|
 |
Part
6
-
Case
No.:
-
Gregg v Scott [HL]
-
Concord Trust v Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc [HL]
-
Tiwari v The State of Trinidad & Tobago [PC]
-
Attorney General for Gibraltar v Shimidzu [PC]
-
Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd v British Columbia [SCC]
-
File
size: 169kb
-
Matter:
"Tobacco Damages and Health Care
Costs Recovery Act, S.B.C. 2000, authorizes an action by
the government of British Columbia against a
manufacturer of tobacco products for the recovery of
health care expenditures incurred by the government in
treating individuals exposed to those products."
-
Pace v Diguglielmo [USSC]
-
File
size: 62kb
-
Matter:
"As in Artuz, we are
guided by the “common usage” and “commo[n]
underst[anding]” of the phrase “properly filed.” Id.,
at 8, 9. In common understanding, a petition filed after
a time limit, and which does not fit within any
exceptions to that limit, is no more “properly
filed” than a petition filed after a time limit that
permits no exception."
-
Pasquantino v United States [USSC]
-
File
size: 93kb
-
Matter:
"At common law, the revenue rule
generally barred courts from enforcing the tax laws of
foreign sovereigns. The question presented in this case
is whether a plot to defraud a foreign government of tax
revenue violates the federal wire fraud statute, 18
U.S.C. § 1343 (2000 ed., Supp. II)."
-
Jones v Reg [HL]
-
File
size: 167kb
-
Matter:
"... all the demonstrators said
that their actions were justified, not only morally but
also legally, because they were aimed at preventing a
greater evil, namely the war in Iraq and its probable
consequences."
-
Brunce v Postworth Ltd [CAEW]
-
File
size: 56kb
-
Matter:
"appeal which is concerned with .... use of workers
supplied by an employment agency to a client in
situations where, in the past, the worker would normally
have been regarded as the employee of either the
employment agency or the client."
-
O'Brien v Justice M Moriarty [SCIre]
-
File
size: 164kb
-
Matter:
"The standard to be met on [an application for
leave for judicial review] is, as stated in G v
Director of Public Prosecutions [1994] 1 I.R. 374: per
Finlay CJ: “... that the facts averred in the
affidavit would be sufficient, if proved, to support a
stateable ground for the form of relief sought by way of
judicial review” ..."
-
Air Canada v Canadian Human Rights Commissiion [SCC]
-
File
size: 59kb
-
Matter:
"To determine whether an employer is discriminating
in remunerating male and female employees, comparisons
must inevitably be made among groups of employees ...
But before they can be made, it is necessary first to
determine which group or groups of employees can be
compared ..."
-
Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v Pentamedia Graphics Ltd [SCInd]
-
-
Doyle v Australian Securities & Investment Commission [HCA]
-
File
size: 48kb
-
Matter:
"After a trial ...
Roberts-Smith J made a declaration ... that the
appellant, .., by his presence and voting at board
meetings of [the Company] ... and by signing a Circular
Resolution .., while being a director of the Company,
had made improper use of his position as a director ..."
-
NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [HCA]
-
File
size: 234kb
-
Matter:
"Undue delay in decision-making,
whether by courts or administrative bodies, is always to
be deplored. However, that comfortable generalisation
does little to advance the task of legal analysis when
it becomes necessary to examine the consequences of
delay. The circumstances in which delay, of itself, will
vitiate proceedings, or a decision, are rare."
|
 |
Part
7
-
Case
No.:
-
Fraser v Canterbury Diocesan Board of Finance [HL]
-
Jackson v Attorney General [HL]
-
File
size: 267kb
-
Matter:
"The appellants all, in
differing ways, have an interest in fox-hunting. They
wish that activity to continue. They challenge the legal
validity of the Hunting Act 2004 which, on its face,
makes it an offence to hunt a wild mammal with a dog ..."
-
Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [PC]
-
Leonelli-Contino v Contino [SCC]
-
E.B. v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia [SCC]
-
File
size: 141kb
-
Matter:
"Children who have suffered
sexual abuse in residential schools are extremely
vulnerable people ... To impose vicarious liability on
the school, the law requires “a strong connection
between what the employer was asking the employee to do
(the risk created by the employer’s enterprise) and
the wrongful act."
-
Small v US [USSC]
-
File
size: 60kb
-
Matter:
"The question before us focuses
upon the words “convicted in any court.” Does this
phrase apply only to convictions entered in any domestic
court or to foreign convictions as well? We hold
that the phrase encompasses only domestic, not foreign,
convictions."
-
Gonzales v Raich [USSC]
-
File
size: 198kb
-
Matter:
"California ... authorize[s]
the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes ...
[W]hether the power vested in Congress by Article I, §8,
of the Constitution “[t]o make all Laws which shall be
necessary and proper for carrying into Execution” its
authority to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,
and among the several States” includes the power to
prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana in
compliance with California law."
-
Crofts v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd [CAEW]
-
File
size: 96kb
-
Matter:
"whether an Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction
... The appellants are air pilots. They ... live in
this country. They were employed, under contracts of
employment with companies registered in Hong Kong, to
pilot aircraft owned by Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. They
were dismissed."
-
Michael Douglas v Hello! Ltd [CAEW]
-
File
size: 311kb
-
Matter:
"The guests [to the Douglases'
wedding] began arriving ... There were speeches,
entertainers, music, and dancing ... [It] transpired
that a paparazzo, ... had infiltrated the reception,
and surreptitiously taken photographs, including some of
the bride and groom ..."
-
O'Brien v DPP [SCIre]
-
File
size: 38kb
-
Matter:
"Whether, ... an accused
person, who has been arrested and detained ... has been
consciously and deliberate deprived of his
constitutional right of access to his solicitor ... the
trial Judge should, as a matter of law, rule that the
entire period of the detention thereafter is ...
unlawful and rule as therefore inadmissible in evidence
all inculpatory statements made at any time in the
course of the period of detention ..."
-
-
Prakash Singh v India [SCInd]
-
Felton v Johnson
[NZSC]
-
Neindorf v Junkovic [HCA]
-
File
size: 168kb
-
Matter:
"... the appellant, as occupier
of the premises, owed the respondent a duty of care. The
issue concerns the standard of care owed by the
appellant to the respondent, and whether there was, in
the circumstances of the case, a breach of duty."
-
Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [HCA]
-
File
size: 45kb
-
Matter:
"In conducting its review, the
Tribunal did not tell the appellant that it had received
the letter; the Tribunal did not tell the appellant that
the allegations made in the letter had been made; the
Tribunal did not ask the appellant about the substance
of any of the allegations made in the letter."
|
 |
Part
8
-
Case
No.:
-
Mersey Care National Health Service Trust v Munjaz [HL]
-
File
size: 204kb
-
Matter:
"Mersey Care National Health Service Trust, as
managers of Ashworth Hospital, implemented a written
policy governing the seclusion of patients detained at
the hospital ... whether that policy is unlawful, ...
inconsistent with the domestic law of England and Wales
or because it fails to comply with the European
Convention on Human Rights."
-
Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc [HL]
-
File
size: 97kb
-
Matter:
"proceedings arise out of the more or less
simultaneous discovery in about 1997 by the appellants
... and the respondents ... that a different
paroxetine salt, paroxetine methanesulfonate
("PMS"), has properties which make it more
suitable for pharmaceutical use."
-
Century National Merchant Bank Ltd v Davies [PC]
-
Hilewitz v Minister of Citizenship & Immigration [SCC]
-
The Lego Case [SCC]
-
File
size: 113kb
-
Matter:
"After the expiry of the last
LEGO patents in Canada, the respondent began
manufacturing and selling similar bricks, using the same
locking method. Kirkbi is now relying on an unregistered
trade-mark, the “LEGO indicia”, which consists of
the well-known geometrical pattern of raised studs on
the top of the bricks as the basis for a claim of
passing off."
-
Johanns v Livestock Marketing Association [USSC]
-
File
size: 80kb
-
Matter:
"For the third time ... we
consider whether a federal program that finances generic
advertising to promote an agricultural product violates
the First Amendment. In these cases, unlike the previous
two, the dispositive question is whether the generic
advertising at issue is the Government’s own speech
and therefore is exempt from First Amendment scrutiny."
-
Granholm v Heald [USSC]
-
Curtin v Clerk of Dáil Éireann [SCIre]
-
-
Cirpaci v Min for Justice [SCIre]
-
Union of India v Dwarka Prasad Tiwari [SCInd]
-
State of Punjab v Amritsar Beverages Ltd [SCInd]
-
File
size: 25kb
-
Matter:
".... that fulfillment of the
conditions .... in the proviso contained in Clause (b)
of Sub-section (3) of Section 14 [General Sales Tax Act,
1948] are imperative in character, the authorities may
take recourse to the aforementioned procedure in respect
of seizure of a hard disk."
-
L v The Queen
[NZSC]
-
Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd [HCA]
-
File
size: 55kb
-
Matter:
"The law of penalties, in its
standard application, is attracted where a contract
stipulates that on breach the contract-breaker will pay
an agreed sum which exceeds what can be regarded as a
genuine pre-estimate of the damage likely to be caused
by the breach."
-
New South Wales v Bujdoso [HCA]
|
 |
Part
9
Case
No.:
Sec of State for the Dept of Health v MH [HL]
Rimmington v Regina [HL]
-
File
size: 165kb
-
Matter:
"These appeals, heard together,
raise important and difficult questions concerning the
definition and ingredients, today, of the common law
crime of causing a public nuisance."
Merson v Cartwright [PC]
-
File
size: 48kb
-
Matter:
"the appellant ..., established her entitlement
against the respondents, ..., and the Attorney General
of the Bahamas, to damages for assault and battery,
false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and
contravention of her constitutional rights."
Clingham v Beaver [USSC]
-
File
size: 107kb
-
Matter:
"Oklahoma has a semi-closed
primary system, in which a political party may invite
only its own party members and voters registered as
Independents to vote in the party’s primary. The Court
of Appeals held that this system violates the right to
freedom of association of the Libertarian Party of
Oklahoma ..."
Cutter v Wilkinson [USSC]
-
File
size: 70kb
-
Matter:
"In response to petitioners’
complaints, respondent prison officials have mounted a
facial challenge to the institutionalized-persons
provision of RLUIPA; respondents contend, inter alia,
that the Act improperly advances religion in violation
of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause."
Merk v International Association of Bridge [SCC]
Medovarski v Min of Citizenship & Immigration [SCC]
-
File
size: 96kb
-
Matter:
"words of this statute, ..., must be interpreted
having regard to the object, text and context of the
provision, considered together: ... In interpreting s.
196 to determine whether it eliminates appeals for
permanent residents for whom a stay from an order for
removal had been granted, I consider the purpose of the
IRPA and its transitional provisions, the French and
English text ..."
Harding v The Pub Estate Co Ltd [CAEW]
Hyperion Records Ltd v Dr Sawkins [CAEW]
Min for Health & Children v PJ Carrol & Co Ltd [NZSC]
Directorate General of Doordarshan v Anand Patwardhan [SCInd]
Peterson Portable Sawing Systems v Lucas [NZSC]
Bhola v Trinidad and Tobago [PC]
|
 |
Part
10
-
Case
No.:
Sec of State for Foreign Affairs v Quark Fishing Ltd [HL]
-
File
size: 133kb
-
Matter:
"This appeal raises a question
on the territorial reach of the Human Rights Act 1998.
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands are in the
remote south Atlantic. They are a British overseas
territory as defined in the British Overseas Territories
Act 2002, but they are not part of the United Kingdom."
R v Soneji [HL]
Panday v Gordon [PC]
Deck v Missouri [USSC]
-
File
size: 114kb
-
Matter:
"We hold that the Constitution forbids the use of
visible shackles during the penalty phase, as it forbids
their use during the guilt phase, unless that use
is “justified by an essential state interest” –
such as the interest in courtroom security – specific
to the defendant on trial."
Lingle v Chevron USA Inc [USSC]
-
File
size: 50kb
-
Matter:
"... in Agins v City of Tiburon, 447 U.S.
255 (1980), the Court declared that government
regulation of private property “effects a taking if
[such regulation] does not substantially advance
legitimate state interests ....” [T]his language
has been ensconced in our Fifth Amendment takings
jurisprudence."
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Copps [SCC]
-
File
size: 92kb
-
Matter:
"The fundamental objective of
the modern law of aboriginal and treaty rights is the
reconciliation of aboriginal peoples and non-aboriginal
peoples and their respective claims, interests and
ambitions. The management of these relationships takes
place in the shadow of a long history of grievances and
misunderstanding."
Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [CAEW]
Chirnside v Fay [NZSC]
-
File
size: 230kb
-
Matter:
"whether parties to a joint
venture owe each other fiduciary duties; what
remedy is appropriate for breach of such duties; and
whether, in arriving at a remedy, a fiduciary ... should
be given an allowance for the effort he has made in
bringing the venture to profit."
D.O. v DPP [SCIre]
Sheedy v The Information Commissioner [SCIre]
-
File
size: 118kb
-
Matter:
"The Irish
Times, applied to the Department of Education under the Freedom of Information
Act, 1997, for access to a
number of Tuairiscí Scoile, including the report written in respect of the
appellant’s school. The Department refused to grant such access, ..."
Mansfield v Director or Public Prosecutions (Western Australia) [HCA]
-
File
size: 89kb
-
Matter:
"The first ground taken by the primary judge is that, in the exercise of
its jurisdiction under the [Criminal
Property Confiscation Act 2000], ... the Supreme Court cannot, in the
exercise of its discretion, require the provision by the [DPP] of an undertaking as to damages
..."
Avas Vikas Sansthan v AVS Engineers Association [SCInd]
Barrett v Rosenthal [SCCalif]
-
File
size: 137kb
-
Matter:
"These provisions (Communications Decency Act of
1996, s.230(c)(1), (e)(3)) have been widely and
consistently interpreted to confer broad immunity
against defamation liability for those who use the
Internet to publish information that originated from
another source. The immunity has been applied regardless
of the traditional distinction between
"publishers" and "distributors.""
CSR Ltd v Maddalena [HCA]
|
[....
END OF 2006 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|