|
|
 |
Part
1
-
Case
No.:
-
A v Sec of State for the Home Dept [HL]
-
File
size: 304kb
-
Matter:
"May the Special Immigration Appeals
Commission ... receive evidence which has or may have been
procured by torture inflicted, in order to obtain evidence, by
officials of a foreign state without the complicity of the
British authorities?"
-
Davidson v Scottish Ministers [HL]
-
File
size: 140kb
-
Matter:
"English courts have power to make
coercive orders, prohibitory and mandatory, against ministers
of the Crown ... [W]hether, in the context of judicial review
proceedings, Scottish courts have similar jurisdiction in
respect of Scottish Ministers ..."
-
PF Sugrue Ltd v AG of NZ [PC]
-
File
size: 50kb
-
Matter:
"New Zealand has found it necessary to
exercise control in respect of its wildlife, in particular the
deer population, in order to reduce damage to farming and to
the environment and to conserve the population by preventing
undue depletion."
-
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd [USSC]
-
McCreary County v ACLU of Kentucky [USSC]
-
File
size: 174kb
-
Matter:
"Executives of two counties posted a
version of the Ten Commandments on the walls of their
courthouses. After suits were filed charging violations of the
Establishment Clause, the legislative body of each county
adopted a resolution calling for a more extensive exhibit
meant to show that the Commandments are Kentucky’s
“precedent legal code,” ...."
-
Herbst v Germany [ECHR]
-
RWC v Canada [SCC]
-
File
size: 106kb
-
Matter:
"R.W.C. had no previous convictions ... He was 13 years
old at the time. Assault with a weapon is
one of the offences for which the trial court must make an
order permitting DNA samples to be taken ... unless the ...
effect of doing so would be “grossly disproportionate to the
public interest” [s. 487.051(2), Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985]"
-
I.R. Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu [SCInd]
-
File
size: 182kb
-
Matter:
"... post-1973, it is impermissible to
immunize Ninth Schedule laws from judicial review ... Such a
course, ..., is incompatible with the doctrine of basic
structure. The existence of power to confer absolute immunity
is not compatible with the implied limitation upon the power
of amendment"
-
Shiu Wing Steel Ltd v Director of Environmental Protection [CFA]
-
Brady v Judge G Haughton [SCIre]
-
File
size: 393kb
-
Matter:
"appellant challenges the lawfulness of certain
procedures [pursuant to s. 51, Criminal Justice Act 1994]
giving effect to a request received from the Crown
Prosecutions Service of the UK for assistance in obtaining
evidence in the State in connection with a criminal
investigation ... in the UK"
-
Van der Merwe v Taylor [CCZA]
-
File
size: 212kb
-
Matter:
"This case concerns the right to claim
the return of property, in the light of the Constitution,
following its seizure by the State. Specifically, the case is
about the seizure of a large sum of foreign currency ..."
-
Ajay Goswami v Union of India [SCInd]
-
Eastern Services Ltd v No 68 Ltd
[NZSC]
-
-
Harriton v Stephens [HCA]
-
File
size: 324kb
-
Matter:
"... this Court decided that the parents of an unplanned
child, born following the negligence of a medical
practitioner, could claim damages for the cost of raising that
child. This type of action has become known as an action for
"wrongful birth" ..."
|
 |
Part
2
|
 |
Part
3
-
Case
No.:
-
Kent County Council v G [HL]
-
Armas v Office of the King's Prosecutor, Brussels [HL]
-
Smith v The Queen [PC]
-
Schaffer v Weast [USSC]
-
File
size: 66kb
-
Matter:
"Under IDEA, school districts must
create an “individualized education program” (IEP) for
each disabled child. If parents believe their child’s IEP is
inappropriate, they may request an “impartial due process
hearing.” The Act is silent, however, as to which party
bears the burden of persuasion ..."
-
Wagnon v Prairie Bank Potawatomi Nation [USSC]
-
File
size: 94kb
-
Matter:
"The Nation maintains that ... the Kansas motor fuel tax
is an impermissible affront to its sovereignty. The Court of
Appeals agreed, holding that the application of the Kansas tax
to fuel received by a non-Indian distributor, but subsequently
delivered to the Nation, was invalid under the
interest-balancing test ..."
-
-
-
Official Receiver and Trustee in Bankruptcy v W.H. Chan [CFA]
-
Ramkripal v State of Madhya Pradesh [SCInd]
-
TS v Director of Public Prosecutor [SCIre]
-
File
size: 43kb
-
Matter:
"allegations of sexual abuse made after a long period of
time, have perhaps predictably given rise to a great deal of
anxious legal debate ... The principles ... in [PC v DPP
[1999] 2 IR 25] ... have involved the sort of compromise that
is perhaps inescapable when two strong and competing rights
are in issue."
-
Shinga v South Africa [CCZA]
-
Doiwala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd v State of Uttaranchal [SCInd]
-
Condon v The Queen [NZSC]
-
File
size: 151kb
-
Matter:
"The question of miscarriage arising
from lack of legal representation for an accused who faces a
sentence of imprisonment if convicted has, as one might
expect, been the subject of much judicial consideration in
other jurisdictions, as well as in earlier New Zealand cases."
-
-
Koroitamana v Commonwealth of Australia [HCA]
-
File
size: 102kb
-
Matter:
"The applicants were born in Australia
.... Their parents are citizens of Fiji. Under the
Constitution of Fiji, the applicants may become citizens of
Fiji by registration, but no application for registration has
been made by them or on their behalf. Neither applicant is an
Australian citizen."
|
 |
Part
4
|
 |
Part
5
|
 |
Part
6
-
Case
No.:
-
Coutts v Reg [HL]
-
File
size: 187kb
-
Matter:
"Evidence was adduced at the trial which would have
enabled a rational jury, ..., to convict him of
manslaughter. But the trial judge, with the support of
the prosecution and the consent of the defence, did not
leave an alternative count of manslaughter to the jury.
He directed the jury that they should convict of murder
if satisfied that the appellant had committed that
offence and, if not so satisfied, acquit."
-
Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust and another
-
Peart v Jamaica [PC]
-
File
size: 106kb
-
Matter:
"The Judges’ Rules constitute a striking example of
judge-made law. Although classed formally as
administrative directions for the guidance of police
officers interviewing suspects, they were afforded over
time a higher status, ... They have been replaced in
England and Wales by the provisions of Code C ... This
appeal concerns the status of the Judges’ Rules,"
-
Edwards v Jamaica [PC]
-
-
-
Road Accident Fund v Mdeyide [CCZA]
-
File
size: 73kb
-
Matter:
"the Prescription Act, similarly to the common law,
protects persons under disability from the consequences
of the running of prescription, by delaying its
completion until at least a year had elapsed after the
disability in question had ceased to exist."
-
Hong Kong SAR v C.W. Hung [CFA]
-
File
size: 101kb
-
Matter:
"ss 47(1) and 47(2) (Dangerous Drugs
Ordinance, Cap. 134) properly interpreted by a
process of remedial interpretation impose only
evidential burdens on the defendant. That being so, the
relevant provisions are constitutionally valid."
-
Aashirwad Films v Union of India [SCInd]
-
File
size: 46kb
-
Matter:
"The purported classification only on
the basis of language without anything more and in
particular having regard to the difference in the rate
of tax, in our opinion is ex-facie arbitrary. The burden
was, therefore, on the State to show that the imposition
was justified."
-
Wildgust v Bank of Ireland [SCIre]
-
File
size: 137kb
-
Matter:
"This case raises an important point
of law concerning ... negligent misstatement ...
[W]hether a claimant, under the principles of ... Hedley
Byrne ... may recover damages in circumstances where
he is not the person to whom a negligent misstatement is
addressed, has not relied upon it, but nonetheless has
suffered loss and damage ..."
-
Garcetti v Ceballos [USSC]
-
S.D. Warren Co v Maine Board of Environmental Protection [USSC]
-
-
-
Clayton v The Queen [HCA]
|
 |
Part
7
|
 |
Part
8
-
Case
No.:
-
Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Trust v Majrowski [HL]
-
Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council [HL]
-
File
size: 70kb
-
Matter:
"whether the claimant, ... has a reasonable prospect of
success in an action against the Natural Environment
Research Council for negligence in issuing a geological
report which he says induced the health authorities in
Bangladesh not to take steps which would have ensured
that his drinking water was not contaminated by arsenic."
-
Trinidad & Tobago v Boyce [PC]
-
File
size: 41kb
-
Matter:
"Boyce was charged with manslaughter .... He put forward
two defences. The first was ... self-defence. The second
was that the blow had not been a cause of Johnson’s
death, which was attributable instead to ... the
insertion of a feeding tube into the lung instead of the
stomach and the temporary failure of the ventilator"
-
Tyack v Mauritius [PC]
-
File
size: 63kb
-
Matter:
"He was charged ... of conspiracy to defraud, ... He
pleaded guilty ... and the Presiding Magistrate
sentenced him to three years’ penal servitude ... His
appeal to the Supreme Court of Mauritius was dismissed
and he has appealed ... to the Privy Council, on the
ground that the sentence imposed was wrong in principle
and manifestly excessive"
-
-
-
-
David Y.W. Ho v K.H. Mak [CFA]
-
File
size: 131kb
-
Matter:
"While there was a dispute as to what precise legal
rights the defendant had contracted to acquire for the
money paid, that did not ultimately matter. Whatever
form the investment was intended to take, it was, ... an
investment which was contingent upon the intended
listing. No listing having occurred, no legal basis
exists for the defendant retaining the money."
-
Sri Baragur v State of Karnataka [SCInd]
-
Atanasov v Refugees Appeal Tribunal [SCIre]
-
File
size: 64kb
-
Matter:
"... a point of great importance
namely, whether an appellant before the Refugee Appeals
Tribunal is legally and/or constitutionally entitled to
access previous decisions of the Tribunal in which
similar and, therefore, relevant issues of law arose."
-
Brigham City v Stuart [USSC]
-
-
-
-
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [HCA]
-
File
size: 265kb
-
Matter:
"A conclusion that, in given circumstances, a defendant
who is sued in negligence owed a duty going beyond a
duty to exercise reasonable care to avoid injury to a
plaintiff, and extending to a duty to ensure that
reasonable care to avoid injury to the plaintiff was
exercised, is commonly described as a conclusion that a
defendant was under a non-delegable duty of care to a
plaintiff."
|
 |
Part
9
-
Case
No.:
-
Laporte v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [HL]
-
Barker v London Borough of Bromley [HL]
-
Bobb v Manning [PC]
-
Cambridge Gas Transport Corporation v The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors [PC]
-
File
size: 40kb
-
Matter:
"The business was, as is frequently the case, held
through offshore companies incorporated in various
jurisdictions. The ships, registered in Liberia, were
owned and managed by a group of Isle of Man companies,
each ship owned by a separate subsidiary of a management
company and all the shares in the management company
held by a holding company, Navigator Holdings plc."
-
-
-
-
Mariner International Hotels Ltd v Atlas Ltd [CFA]
-
Haridas Das v Usha Rani Banik [SCInd]
-
C.C. v Attorney General of Ireland [SCIre]
-
File
size: 89kb
-
Matter:
"[Counsel] pointed out that as the
law stands, a defendant, ..., will find himself without
a defence even if he were positively convinced by the
girl herself that she was over the statutory age, and
had objectively reasonable grounds for believing it."
-
-
-
-
-
Min for Immigration v QAAH of 2004 [HCA]
-
File
size: 224kb
-
Matter:
"whether an entrant to Australia, who has been granted a
temporary protection visa, is, on its expiry, and
notwithstanding benign changes in the conditions of the
country from which he fled, entitled under Australian
law to assert that he continues to be a person to whom
Australia owes protection obligations."
|
 |
Part
10
-
Case
No.:
-
Tweed v Parades Commission for Northern Ireland [HL]
-
K v Sec of State for the Home Department [HL]
-
File
size: 216kb
-
Matter:
"The second appellant was born in Sierra
Leone ... She arrived in the United Kingdom ... and
claimed asylum. The basis of her claim was that, if
returned to Sierra Leone, she would be at risk of
subjection to female genital mutilation"
-
Re A: Mother of child v Father [HL]
-
Attorney General of Cayman Islands v James Cleaver & Co [PC]
-
File
size: 91kb
-
Matter:
"The background to the Grand Court’s decision to sit en
banc was judicial concern to ensure that the fees
charged by insolvency practitioners in Cayman Island
insolvencies and liquidations were and could be seen to
fair and reasonable - having regard, ..., to the Cayman
Islands’ position as one of the world’s largest
financial centres ...,"
-
-
-
Fuel Retailers Assocition of South Africa v Director General of Environmental Management [CCZA]
-
T.H. Leung v The Incorporated Owners of Kwok Wing House [CFA]
-
-
Dunne v Min for Environment, Heritage & Local Government [SCIre]
-
File
size: 103kb
-
Matter:
"Section 8 [National Monuments
(Amendment) Act, 2004] introduced a special provision in
relation to the ... M50 C-Ring motorway ... with a view
to facilitating the completion of works at ... an
archaeological site at Carrickmines Castle ... [W]hether
that section offends Articles 5, 10, 15 and 40 of the
Constitution, ..."
-
Arlington Central School District Board of Education v Murphy [USSC]
-
-
File
size: 76kb
-
Matter:
""
-
-
-
-
File
size: 138kb
-
Matter:
""
|
 |
Part
11
|
 |
Part
12
-
Case
No.:
-
Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin' Ltd [HL]
-
Boake Allen Ltd v Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs [HL]
-
File
size: 61kb
-
Matter:
"... the Income and Corporation Taxes
Act 1988 [s.247], ... recognised the unity of a group of
companies which are in law separate persons but
economically a single enterprise. It provided that a
parent and subsidiary, both resident in the United
Kingdom, could jointly elect that the subsidiary would
pay dividends free of ACT and the parent would receive
them without the benefit of a tax credit."
-
McLachlan v Mercury Geotherm Ltd [PC]
-
File
size: 43kb
-
Matter:
"the issues before the Board are in quite a small
compass, focusing on the correct construction of a right
of pre-emption in clause 16.1 of the master agreement,
and on whether (if clause 16.1 does not get the
appellants home) they can achieve the same or a similar
result by relying on an implied duty of good faith."
-
Mohit v DPP [PC]
-
File
size: 61kb
-
Matter:
"whether a decision by the DPP of Mauritius to
discontinue a private prosecution, in exercise of his
powers under [the Constitution, section 72(3)(c)], is in
principle susceptible to review by the courts ... [The]
Supreme Court held that it was not,"
-
-
-
-
H.W. Oei v HKSAR [CFA]
-
File
size: 162kb
-
Matter:
"Where the prosecution seeks to prove
a conspiracy against A and B and where B is not before
the court, are documentary records which
are seized from B’s premises; and which
are not proven to have been written by B or on his
instructions admissible in A’s trial for any purpose
other than to prove B’s participation in the unlawful
enterprise alleged?"
-
-
J.B. v DPP [SCIre]
-
Clark v Arizona [USSC]
-
Dixon v US [USSC]
-
File
size: 93kb
-
Matter:
"And, in the context of the defence of duress, it accords
with the doctrine that “where the facts with regard to
an issue lie peculiarly in the knowledge of a party,
that party has the burden of proving the issue.”"
-
-
-
SZBEL v Min for Immigration [HCA]
|
[....
END OF 2007 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|