|
|
 |
Part
1
|
 |
Part
2
-
Case
No.:
-
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Hurst [HL]
-
File
size: 114kb
-
Matter:
"Mrs. Hurst asked the coroner to exercise his discretion
to resume the adjourned inquest ... She wished the coroner to
investigate what she alleged were the failings of the police
and the housing authority, ..., to protect her son from Reid
... [T]he coroner declined to reopen the inquest."
-
Jordan v Lord Chancellor of Northern Ireland [HL]
-
File
size: 132kb
-
Matter:
"Each of these two cases, ...,
concerns an inquest which has been opened and is to continue
... Each inquest concerns a death which occurred years ago:
... Both the deceased, .., were directly shot and killed by
agents of the state ..."
-
DPP v Penn [PC]
-
Tung Shun Transportation & Engineering Ltd v Y.H. Fong [CFA]
-
Butenas v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [SCIre]
-
File
size: 61kb
-
Matter:
"The appellant’s claim is that the
terms of that provision were such that it precluded the
release on bail pending surrender, in every case and in all
circumstances, the person in respect of whom an Order of
surrender was made. Accordingly, s.16(4) is unconstitutional
..."
-
-
Occupiers of 51, Olivia Road, Johannesburg v City of Johannesburg [CCZA]
-
-
British Columbia v Zastowny [SCC]
-
-
-
-
-
Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [HCA]
-
Betfair Pty Ltd v Western Australia [HCA]
|
 |
Part
3
|
 |
Part
4
-
Case
No.:
-
H v The Queen [HL]
-
File
size: 191kb
-
Matter:
"... defendant, ..., was charged, with
conspiracy to defraud. She made an application [Criminal
Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s.8] for disclosure of
documents in the possession of the prosecution. The
application was made in the course of a preparatory hearing
..."
-
Rogers v R [HL]
-
File
size: 30kb
-
Matter:
"whether using the words "bloody foreigners"
and "get back to your own country" can transform the
offence of using abusive words and behaviour with intent to
cause fear or provoke violence, contrary to section 4 of the
Public Order Act 1986, into the racially aggravated form of
that offence ..."
-
-
-
Cosgrove v The Electricity Supply Board [SCIre]
-
-
-
-
Dunsmuir v New Brunswick [SCC]
-
-
-
-
-
-
CTM v Australia [HCA]
-
File
size: 294kb
-
Matter:
"The principal focus of the
appellant's conviction appeal ... was whether a "common
law defence" of honest and reasonable mistake of fact
applied ..., such as would exculpate the appellant if he had
held a belief, at the time of the sexual intercourse, that the
complainant was over the age of 16 years."
|
 |
Part
5
|
[....
END OF 2008 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|