|
|
 |
Part
1
|
 |
Part 2
|
 |
Part 3
-
Case
No.:
-
Chief Constable of the Herforshire Police v Van Colle [HL]
-
File
size: 163kb
-
Matter:
"if the police are alerted to a threat that D may kill or
inflict violence on V, and the police take no action to
prevent that occurrence, and D does kill or inflict violence
on V, may V or his relatives obtain civil redress against the
police, and if so, how and in what circumstances?"
-
Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner [HL]
-
Durity v AG of Trinidad & Tobago [PC]
-
-
Chatterjee v Ontario [SCC]
-
File
size: 94kb
-
Matter:
"whether the Ontario Remedies for Organized Crime and
Other Unlawful Activities Act, 2001, ..., which authorizes the
forfeiture of proceeds of unlawful activity, is ultra vires
Ontario because it encroaches on the federal criminal law
power"
-
-
Ritcher v Min for Home Affairs [CCZA]
-
C.K. Chan v Frank Y.K. Yu [CFA]
-
-
Pacific Bell Telephone Co v Linkline Communications Inc [USSC]
-
Plains Commerce Bank v Long Family Land & Cattle Co [USSC]
-
File
size: 87kb
-
Matter:
"Following the sale, an Indian couple, customers of the
bank who had defaulted on their loans, claimed the bank
discriminated against them by offering the land to non-Indians
on terms more favourable than those the bank offered to them.
The couple sued on that claim in tribal court"
-
-
NZ Recreational Fishing Council Inc v NZ Big Game Fishing Council Inc [NZSC]
-
-
|
 |
Part
4
|
 |
Part 5
|
 |
Part 6
-
Case
No.:
-
Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [HL]
-
McKinnon v United States of America [HL]
-
File
size: 50kb
-
Matter:
"The appellant’s main argument focuses on the wide
disparity between on the one hand the predicted likely outcome
if the appellant cooperated with the US authorities ... and on
the other hand the threatened likely outcome if the appellant
refused to cooperate ... Such a disparity, it is submitted, is
disproportionate and subjected the appellant to impermissible
pressure to surrender his legal rights, particularly his right
to contest extradition"
-
George v Eagle Air Services Ltd [PC]
-
File
size: 28kb
-
Matter:
"Aircraft, even small aircraft, do not usually crash, and
certainly should not do so. And, if they do, then, especially
where the crash is on land as here, it is not unreasonable to
suppose that their owner/operators will inform themselves of
any unusual causes and not unreasonable to place on them the
burden of producing an explanation"
-
-
Reg v McNeil [SCC]
-
-
S.Y. Ho v Y.L. Chan [CFA]
-
Ping An Securities Ltd v Zhongguó píngan baoxian (Group) Ltd [CFA]
-
US v Eurodif S.A. [USSC]
-
File
size: 50kb
-
Matter:
"Section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930 calls for
“anti-dumping” duties on “foreign merchandise” sold in
the United States at “less than its fair value,” 19 U. S.
C. §1673, but does not touch international sales of services"
-
-
File
size: 68kb
-
Matter:
""
-
Winter v Natural Resources Defence Council Inc [USSC]
-
-
Stevens v Premium Real Estate Ltd [NZSC]
-
File
size: 144kb
-
Matter:
"Mr and Mrs Stevens were entitled to compensation, both in
equity and under s 43 of the Fair Trading Act, for any loss resulting from the
non-disclosure which was both in breach of fiduciary duty and false and misleading
conduct in trade"
-
-
|
 |
Part 7
-
Case
No.:
-
Davis v Regina [HL]
-
File
size: 177kb
-
Matter:
"It is a long-established principle of the English common
law that, subject to certain exceptions and statutory
qualifications, the defendant in a criminal trial should be
confronted by his accusers in order that he may cross-examine
them and challenge their evidence"
-
Director of the Serious Fraud Office v Corner House Research [HL]
-
Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha of Trinidad & Tobago v Maharaj [PC]
-
-
Patrick v Canada [SCC]
-
File
size: 90kb
-
Matter:
"The appellant contends that the police inspection of his
garbage amounted to a search and seizure and was unreasonable
within the meaning of s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms. Further, he says the evidence taken from the
garbage, and other evidence obtained under the subsequent
search warrant, should be excluded"
-
-
-
H.S. Wong v HKSAR [CFA]
-
File
size: 90kb
-
Matter:
"A driver was convicted of attempting to export
unmanifested cargo. Forfeiture of the cargo was sought against
an unconvicted owner. It was alleged that he had been
complicit in the attempt. What is the standard to which, and
the approach on which, such complicity must be proved?"
-
-
Ysursa v Pocatello Education Association [USSC]
-
File
size: 110kb
-
Matter:
"Under Idaho law, a public employee may elect to have a
portion of his wages deducted by his employer and remitted to
his union to pay union dues. He may not, however, choose to
have an amount deducted and remitted to the union’s
political action committee"
-
Bartlett v Strickland [USSC]
-
File
size: 110kb
-
Matter:
"whether the [Voting Rights Act 1965] can be invoked to
require state officials to draw election-district lines to
allow a racial minority to join with other voters to elect the
minority’s candidate of choice, even where the racial
minority is less than 50 percent of the voting-age population"
-
-
Nielsen v Dysart Timbers Ltd [NZSC]
-
-
|
 |
Part 8
|
 |
Part 9
|
 |
Part
10
-
Case
No.:
-
Re P (Adoption) [HL]
-
Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [HL]
-
File
size: 123kb
-
Matter:
"is the rule that a party may recover losses which were
foreseeable (“not unlikely”) an external rule of law,
imposed upon the parties to every contract in default of
express provision to the contrary, or is it a prima facie
assumption about what the parties may be taken to have
intended"
-
-
-
Co-operators Life Insurance Co v Gibbens [SCC]
-
File
size: 88kb
-
Matter:
"a claim under an accident insurance policy by Mr. Gibbens who
had unprotected sex ... He thereby acquired genital herpes,
which in turn caused inflammation of his spinal cord ...,
which resulted in total paralysis from his mid-abdomen down"
-
-
Brummer v Min for Social Development [CCZA]
-
File
size: 140kb
-
Matter:
"The third application is by the South African Human
Rights Commission for its admission as amicus curiae.
These applications arise from a request by the applicant, Mr
Brümmer, a journalist, for certain records held by the
Department of Social Development"
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bujak v The Solicitor General [NZSC]
-
-
|
 |
Part
11
|
 |
Part
12
-
Case
No.:
-
Helow v Sec of State for Home Dept [HL]
-
File
size: 84kb
-
Matter:
"She avers that, in consequence, she is at risk of harm
not only from Israeli agents, but also from Lebanese agents
and, because of her links with the Palestinian Liberation
Organisation, from Syrian agents. On that basis she claimed
asylum in this country"
-
-
-
-
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v Canadian Federation of Students [SCC]
-
-
Du Toit v Min of Safety and Security [CCZA]
-
-
-
-
-
Ye v Min of Immigration [NZSC]
-
File
size: 87kb
-
Matter:
"More particularly, the cases involve overstayer parents
of children born in New Zealand at a time when those children
attained New Zealand citizenship at birth. The children
themselves could not therefore be removed from New Zealand.
One important issue is the extent to which the interests of
such children should feature in the necessary decision-making"
-
Tiny Intelligence Ltd v Resport Ltd [NZSC]
-
File
size: 63kb
-
Matter:
"appellant, obtained judgment for liability against
Resport Limited, the respondent, for infringement of copyright
in artistic works, being designs for a toy sword and a toy
trumpet. Reproductions of these works were sold to supporters
of the Crusaders rugby team"
-
-
|
[....
END OF 2009 ....]
all
rights reserved
taiking.thing
pte ltd
|
|
|